Break the [wounds + unawareness] cycle and guard your descendents

What's Normal In a Stepfamily?

 Realities 11 to 21 (of 60)

By Peter K. Gerlach, MSW
Member, NSRC Expert Council

colorbar

    The Web address of this 8-page article is http://sfhelp.org/04/myths.htm

        Clicking links below will open a full window or an informational popup, so please turn off your browser's popup blocker or allow popups from this nonprofit site

            This is the second of five pages summarizing typical stepfamily realities. See the directions and background here. Before reading this page, recall why you're doing so. What do you need?

    Here's What's (Usually) REAL (continued)...


[ Myth 11 ] Typical courtships evoke (a) extra politeness and thoughtfulness, (b) reluctance to confront, and (c) high tolerance for values-differences and irritating behavior, specially in the beloved-others' child/ren. Partners' and adult-child relationships often change dramatically after exchanging commitment vows and cohabiting

        Partners' committing to each other alters key roles: biomom's boyfriend turn into "stepfather;" "your daughter" becomes "my stepdaughter;" "your woman-friend" is now stepmothering my granddaughter, and is my new daughter-in-law; your ex-spouse's delaying child support now affects our finances (vs. yours); "your" nerdy (or cool) son becomes "my stepbrother"; etc.

       These many concurrent - and often sudden - role changes often cause stepfamily members to (a)  unconsciously alter their expectations of themselves and each other ("Now I must love you, and you must obey me"), or to (b) feel suddenly confused on what to expect.

        If all co-parents and kids (a) aren't expecting these overnight changes, and (b) don't accept a long period of confusion and readjustment in and between their homes as normal, they can feel stressed, self-doubtful, anxious, and disoriented.

       Bottom line: courtship relationships and behaviors are often not a reliable guide to what will happen after a commitment ceremony. Similarly, living together before exchanging vows probably won't accurately foretell post-commitment harmony or strife. Expect the unexpected!


[ Myth 12
Legally and socially, re/marriage or co-commitment does create a new family. However, it often takes four or more years after committing for most stepfamily households to begin to feel closeness, bonding, and loyalty similar to a healthy intact biofamily. This is true even if one or more "ours kids" are conceived by the new couple.

        Because of the number of adults, kids, relationships, and biofamily-merger complexity, it can take four or more annual cycles of birthdays, holidays, visitations, vacations, etc. to forge and stabilize a new stepfamily identity and a shared sense of "us-ness." The greater the dissimilarity of customs and values in the several merging families, and the lower the co-parents' skill at effective communication, the longer such stabilizing can take.

       This stepfamily identity-formation involves members' gradually clarifying and melding ideas on who has what roles and responsibilities in their family - including noncustodial bioparents, their new spouses (if any), step/grandparents, ex-in-laws, and half siblings.

       Conflicting traditions on managing special events need to be compromised: e.g. graduations or  retirements; major sicknesses; births, marriages, or deaths; altering wills and paying taxes; house moves or redecorations; school, job, or church changes; acquiring pets; communions, baptisms, or bar/bas mitzvahs; special anniversaries; reunions; etc. How to "do" these "right" has to be renegotiated among all members of two or more families.

       Sometimes these variables are so complex and/or the merging biofamilies' values are so different, that a multi-home stepfamily never fully bonds or grows a coherent identity or loyalties like a high-nurturance biofamily. This doesn't mean it can't be a viable family, it means it feels very "different." Co-parents who define clear stepfamily goals early on, and commit to working patiently toward them as mutually-respectful teammates, often achieve the most satisfying bonding over time.
 

[ Myth 13 ]  Recall the difference between being accepted as a full member of some group, and being a guest or outsider (non-member). Here acceptance and inclusion mean "all other members of our  family...

  • know who I am, and...

  • what my family roles and titles are, and...

  • want to include me and my relatives in important family decisions and activities, and...

  • genuinely care about my needs, feelings, and opinions, as I care about theirs."

Partial or mixed inclusion happens when some family members include a new person and others don't.

        Significantly -wounded (unaware, needy) courting co-parents often underestimate the difficulty of trying to get all members of a new nuclear stepfamily to fully accept and include each other. This is specially likely if any adult or child in the existing divorced or bereaved biofamily - including ex mates, minor and adult children, and "close" relatives - isn't well along on grieving their many family losses.

        Most stepfamily analysts suggest that it can take four or more years after co-committing (vs. cohabiting) to achieve stable-enough mutual inclusion. For perspective, acceptance spans 16 categories of things, not just "accepting a stepparent (the person)" or "stepsiblings liking each other"!

        The most sensitive inclusion arenas are between a new stepparent, each stepchild, and the kids' "other bioparent," if living. If the stepparent has kids, they need to accept their new stepparent, and each stepsibling and "close" step-relative.

        Bottom line: expect full mutual inclusion to be a multi-year process after (a) any commitment ceremony, and (b) after overcoming many significant relationship triangles and values and loyalty conflicts. Typically, full inclusion after co-habiting without formal re/marriage is even more complex. The most difficult inclusion scenario is new co-parenting partners cohabiting before one or both are legally or psychologically divorced.
 

[ Myths 14 - 16 ] Normal stepfamily structure forces bioparents to repeatedly choose between filling the needs of their new mate, one or more biokids, and sometimes their ex mate. Over time, all adult and child members of typical multi-home stepfamilies find themselves "caught in the middle" of such conflicts. Repeated stepfamily loyalty and inclusion clashes are inevitable for years. They're often unexpectedly stressful for everyone.

       All families have loyalty conflicts. In them, one member feels caught between the opposing needs of two or more others. However, such conflicts feel and sound very different in typical stepfamilies. Instead of "You want 'x' and our child wants 'y'," it's "You want (or your child wants) 'x' and my child wants 'y'." Or "You want 'x', and my ex-mate wants 'y'." Usually "x" and "y" are about child visitations, money, or parenting-values and/or priorities. 

        Loyalty conflicts in and between stepfamily homes occur often in an average week, for years. So can associated relationship triangles. These may decrease with time, if co-parents are consistently clear and unified on identifying and managing them cooperatively.

        Some insecure stepkids may repeatedly force their custodial bioparent to choose between new spouse and old, to clarify their family rank and test the safety of their new family. Some stepparents are startled to find that occasionally or often, their spouse puts the needs or values of their ex mate ahead of theirs. This is specially likely when the focus is on a stepchild's welfare and/or avoiding major inter-home conflict.

       Most often, the biomom or biodad feels painfully caught between their new mate and one or more minor or adult biokids- often over conflicts on household and family responsibilities, boundaries, rules, and consequences (specially child discipline), and "fairness" (priorities). If the bioparent agrees with one person, the other feels betrayed and resentful - a lose-lose situation. No one is wrong when these dilemmas happen. They occur naturally, due to stepfamily-systems' structure.

       Unless they're shame-based Grown Wounded Children who expect to feel "1-down," stepparents' normal needs for respect, recognition, and inclusion guarantee they'll need their mate to choose between them and their biochild/ren, often.

        Unaware stepparents can begin to (unfairly) fault themselves for "creating" these normal conflicts. Courtship politeness and tolerance inexorably fades with time, and resentments over feeling second (or fifth) can grow bitter and re/maritally corrosive. Feelings of rejection are primal, and are rarely influenced by logic.

       Alluring non-solutions to significant loyalty conflicts are to (a) deny they exist, (b) minimize their stressfulness, (c) justify them, (d) choose lose-lose blaming and arguing, and/or (e) rationalize that the stepparent is an adult and should not expect to come "first." So: expect and accept these priority clashes and triangles without blame as normal (inevitable) stepfamily dynamics. 

        Where negotiated compromises don't appear, I propose that for long-term stepfamily health, the mates' (non-emergency) priorities should be

  • personal integrities and wholistic health first,

  • mates' relationship should rank second "enough" of the time, as judged by each stepparent; and

  • all else third.

Paradoxically, putting the mates' relationship second now puts dependent kids first long-term, by lowering the odds of traumatic psychological or legal re/divorce.

[ Myths 17 & 18 ]  Longing to build an (ideal) new (bio)family, typical stepfamily mates and their relatives commonly expect their family members to eventually exchange the equivalent of biofamily love. This can happen, over time - especially if (a) stepchildren are very young, (b) adults are minimally wounded, and (c) prior divorces were amicable and well-healed.

        It also may never happenAdults can unintentionally stress their kids and each other by expecting them to love their stepkin. Like respect, trust, and friendship, love must  be earned, not demanded

        Even if a stepchild does feels warmly toward their stepparent, their (wounded, insecure) bioparent/s  may resent and/or fear such affection. That biomom or dad may openly or subtly criticize, manipulate, or discourage their genetic child/ren from feeling or openly expressing that warmth. This puts their kids in a major loyalty conflict (Q14 above), which they often don't know how to cope with.

       A painful reality is that some adults or stepsibs can't find a way to like a particular stepchild (or vice versa), let alone love them. Despite hope, effort, and prayer, their "chemistry" just doesn't mesh over time. Experts advise making mutual respect the first relationship goal for stepparents, stepkids, and stepsibs. Gradually, this may ripen into friendship, affection, and - with luck - real love. If this doesn't happen, it can't be helped - no one is wrong or "bad."
 

[ Myth 19 ] Some stepkids steadily reject a stepparent's genuine affection and support for no apparent reason. Perversely, the nicer the stepparent is, the more hostile or indifferent the child may seem. Or a stepparent can offer caring friendship, discipline and guidance to their stepchild/ren, to find that their spouse disagrees with these or resents their "interference" with their biochild. Both result in stressful loyalty conflicts (Q14 above) and stressful relationship triangles. They may stem from one or more of these:

  • Incomplete grieving [29-30],

  • Denied or overt sexual tension or attraction [39],

  • Excessive guilts [42],

  • Premature or inappropriately-strict stepparent discipline;

  • A bioparent's codependence on, and over-protectiveness with, their child, and/or...

  • The child's normal testing of stepfamily stability and safety ("Will this family bust up too?")

       A confused (or alert) stepchild may feel "If I show appreciation to my stepparent, my 'real' (same-sex biological) parent will feel bad!" Their custodial biomom or biodad can feel "If I side with your (the stepparent's) discipline of my child, my child (or my ex or other kin) will resent, criticize, and reject me." If adults are unable to admit and discuss these honestly, escalating stress is very likely.

       Bioparents and bio-kin usually don't expect thanks from their kids for their loving caregiving efforts and sacrifices. Average stepparents do expect and need spontaneous acknowledgment from their mate and their stepkids for their co-parenting efforts . 

        Since typical minor stepkids didn't ask for their parents' divorce and re/marriage or have a say in selecting their step-kin, they may not appreciate even the kindest stepparent. This is specially likely if they and their parents and siblings haven't progressed well on grieving their web of family-adjustment losses (broken bonds). In the best case, stepparents may hear sincere "thanks!" years after their stepkids have left home.

[ Myths 20 - 21 Even if all co-parents agree that a stepparent has "authority" to discipline their stepchildren, the kids and/or their sibs may not agree. Unless very young, stepkids usually feel the new adult has to earn the right to tell them what to do. Also, the kids' other bioparent or key bio-relatives may not acknowledge the stepparent's authority - and/or may dislike the stepparent's disciplinary "style" (lax / harsh; consistent / inconsistent).

        This traps the kids and co-parents into repeated loyalty conflicts and relationship triangles, often causing the child/ren to resist and/or "get depressed."

        Ideally, the bioparent/s will do most major disciplining for months after vowing commitments and cohabiting. until the stepparent/s and stepkid/s have had a chance to build some mutual trust and respect. One source of respect is the stepparent firmly asserting her or his rights (boundaries) as a dignified person.  

        A stepparent forcing new rules and consequences on a stepchild "too soon" usually causes open or hidden hurt, resentment, anger, and resistance. Waiting too long may prevent or lose the stepchild's respect, because they feel the adult is wimpy or powerless.

       This happens also if the bioparent habitually sabotages the stepparent's efforts at discipline. A worst case occurs when a new stepparent patronizingly says or implies his or her mate's prior efforts at child discipline were ineffective, weak, or "wrong," and s/he's here to "fix" this. One of many new-stepfamily tasks is all active co-parents negotiating (a) what a stepparent is responsible for, and (b) how and (c) when s/he assumes caregiving responsibility and authority.

       If it isn't practical to go slowly, it helps if the bioparent "authorizes" the stepparent in front of their stepkids, like: "Melissa, if Jerry tells you to do something, it's as just though I'm telling you...". Some experts recommend that stepparents act like aunts or uncles until full co-parental authority is earned over time.

<<  Prior page  /  Add to favorites   /  Print this page  /  Email this series' address  >>

colorbar

 home  /  site overview  /  directory  /  site map  /  Q&A  /  quizzes  /  solutions  /  site search  /  glossary

  research  /  free course  /  guidebooks  NEW  forums resources  /  feedback  and/or  subscribe  * copyright info

Updated  October 12, 2008