Break the [wounds + unawareness] cycle and guard your descendents

Identify and Own Your Attitudes

They Shape Your
Family Relationships

By Peter K. Gerlach, MSW
 

colorbar.gif (1095 bytes)

  • home > site overview > site map, directory, or search > Q&A, solutions index (ex mates) or other page > here

The Web address of this two-page article is http://sfhelp.org/Rx/ex/attitudes.htm

        Clicking links below will open a full window or an informational popup, so please turn off your browser's popup blocker or allow popups from this nonprofit Web site.

        This is one of over 150 articles focused on healing psychological wounds,  building high-nurtur-ance family relationships, breaking the [wounds + unawareness] cycle, and preventing divorce. This introduction describes the Web site's purpose and the best ways to use its resources. Each article is part of a mosaic of ideas, so the more you read, the more sense they'll all make. These articles augment, vs. replace, other qualified professional help.  

        Before continuing, reflect: why are you reading this - what do you need?

+ + +

        This article is primarily for family adults who have significant chronic conflicts with other adult family members - specially with co-parenting ex mates. Premise: intentionally modifying key atti-tudes can help prevent or reduce (vs. resolve) some family conflicts.

About Attitudes

        All kids and adult form conscious or unconscious attitudes - judgments - about persons, places, and physical and abstract things. Attitudes are a class of beliefs that are polarized between good / bad; right / wrong; nice / not nice; desirable / undesirable, safe / harmful, healthy / toxic, normal / abnormal, etc.

        Attitudes come from real and fictional heroes and mentors and from life experience. They range from minor to explosive, depending on the context and the behaviors and social reactions they cause - (e.g. burning heretics and witches, and bombing abortion clinics, churches, or other public places).

        Attitudes may be rational ("swimming with sharks is a bad idea") or based on hearsay and faith ("blondes tend to be dumber than brunettes and redheads"). Many attitude may be questioned and modified in the right circumstances, which will usually cause related changes in behavior. A classic example is atheists or agnostics converting to the attitude that "God is real and good."

        The pressure to agree with certain family and societal values to avoid scorn and rejection - or even punishment - can powerfully shape a child's or adult's attitudes. An underlying dynamic is the attitude "Anyone who disagrees with my or our attitudes about (something) is bad / wrong / inferior / a sinner / an enemy." Have you experienced that?

       To get the most from this article, first inventory your attitudes about divorce, remarriage, stepfamilies, and related topics. Also get clear on your attitudes about attitudes - are they useful / not useful; flexible / rigid; important to you / unimportant; etc.

+ + +

        As a professional stepfamily therapist since 1981, I've heard the stories of over 1,000 divorcing and remarried co-parents and couples. About 90% of their situations involve children and one or more ex mates. The other ~10% are widow/ers, who's former spouses often still have great genetic, psychological, and often financial influence on their surviving family members.

        Well over half of their complex stories involved significant ongoing conflict between prior (ex) mates. Most hadn't found an effective way to reduce their conflicts, which were stressing co-parents and kids alike.

       I’ve heard a rich medley of ex-mate descriptors like Fang, the Claw, psycho bitch, idiot, bastard, compulsive liar, irresponsible, crazy, uncaring, selfish, malicious, insensitive, abusive, stupid, ignorant, hopeless, wacko, heartless, and evil. I’ve also heard ex mates described as “a really good parent, but a lousy mate.” These are attitudes (good-bad judgments) of the wo/man’s worth as a person and/or as a co-parent and spouse.

        Reflect: what adjectives do you usually use to describe your and/or your partner’s ex mate? Do your adjectives describe the kind of person s/he is, or how s/he does at the role of parent? What adjectives do you think s/he uses to describe you? How do you think these attitudes affect...

  • your co-parenting relationships,

  • your kids’ wholistic health, and...

  • the nurturance level of your multi-home family?

        Our U.S. divorce epidemic forces millions of parents and kids to live a stressful paradox, for years: one or both mates say “I no longer like, respect, or trust you, and I choose not to live with you; but I must interact with you because of my love and responsibility for our child/ren.

        This article suggests key attitudes and expectations that can promote your co-parent teambuilding and long-term caregiving effectiveness and satisfaction. Use this article and series to become aware of your caregivers’ attitudes and expectations, and what they may mean to you adults and kids, short and long term.

        Before you continue, check: is your true Self reading these words? If not, do you know who's currently in charge of your amazing personality (inner family of subselves)?

        Premise: your current and long-term marital and child-raising satisfactions depend on your inner-family leadership, awareness, knowledge, and key attitudes. Once your family adults are aware of your attitudes, you may choose to discuss and shift some of them for current and long-term benefits.

        What attitudes?

        Before exploring your attitudes about each of these and what they may mean to you and your loved ones, do a…

Status Check: See what’s true for you now: T = true, F = false, and “?” means ”I’m not sure, or “It depends on..." (what?)

I see both bioparents of each child in my life, and any new partners (stepparents), as co-equal members of our multi-home nuclear stepfamily  now. (T F ?)

I can clearly define what “an attitude” is. (T F ?)

I believe our family adults' attitudes have a direct effect on (a) the quality of our co-parenting and (b) how our dependent kids will “turn out,” long term. (T F ?)

I feel attitudes can be consciously _ chosen and _ changed if there’s reason to do so.
(T F ?)

I’m responsible for the attitudes I hold. (T F ?)

When planning and making childcare and family decisions, and in family conflicts, I’m usually aware of (a) my attitudes on the factors above, and (b) those of each other adult involved. (T F ?)

I’m comfortable discussing key (a) attitudes and (b) expectations with each of our family  adults now. (T F ?)

I feel my partner (if any) would answer “true” to each of these items now. (T F ?)

At this time, (a) we co-parents have no serious “attitude problems” about family issues; or if we do, (b) we have an effective way of resolving them now. (T F ?).

I’m sure that my true Self is answering these questions now. (T F ?)       

        Pause and note your thoughts and feelings. What do they mean? With this fresh in mind, let’s start our "attitude safari" with your belief on…


1)  Attitudes: Relevant or Not?

        Have you co-parents ever discussed your “family attitude policy”? Do any of you have biases or prejudices about certain family attitudes and the people who hold or promote them? If all your family adults and supporters met together, imagine if anyone would disagree with these key attitudes:

Forming attitudes (good/bad, better/worse, or right/wrong judgments) is normal, human, and neither god or bad.

Attitudes and other beliefs shape kids' and adults' behavior directly and unconsciously;

Certain attitudes are “better than others” - i.e. they are more effective in promoting personal healing, mutual respect, effective co-parenting teamwork, and high-nurturance relationships and families.

It’s good for co-parents to help each other become aware of their key goals and attitudes, and intentionally shift their attitudes toward those that are more effective.

Co-parents ignoring or being unclear about family-related attitudes is bad because it risks hindering long-term success with their common goals. And…

Thoughtfully
forming and owning your own attitudes, rather than passively accepting the attitudes of family elders and others, is necessary to evolve a person's true identity and integrity.

Separating attitudes from the people that hold them is good, because it minimizes the chance of hurt, resentment, anger, and hostility.  

        Pause and reflect: can you think of other attitudes about human, relationship, and family attitudes that your family adults and kids would benefit from? How comfortable are you at discussing attitudes like these with your family members (including kids) and key supporters?

Status Check: Overall, I feel our adult's attitudes about key attitudes helps our stepfamily (True  False  Unsure)

2)  Ex mates: Bad vs. Wounded?

        Do you believe some people are better than others? Do you feel some people are bad by choice or nature? If you judge an ex mate in your family as a “bad” person or “bad influence” on your kids, it will taint every negotiation and interaction you have with them. Your kids lose.

        One reason: your family adults communicate to fill your current needs. A universal need is to feel respected - specially by your family members (right?). The effectiveness of your communication depends directly on the R(espect)-messages that you each perceive from each other. If you or an ex mate decodes “You don’t respect me (as a person or a co-parent)” from the other’s behavior,

  • hurt, resentful, defensive subselves will probably take over, causing...

  • your E(motion)-level to rise “above your ears,” so...

  • your abilities to hear, empathize, and problem-solve drop fast, and...

  • neither you nor the ex get your primary needs met.

This is specially likely if either of you is a shame-based (wounded) person with low self esteem.

        If you’re not aware of this happening and what it means, you each will learn to expect that any time you and an ex mate interact, you and/or they will feel “badly” (disrespected and unheard), and that com-munications “won’t work.”

        This dooms important co-parenting negotiations before they start. Ex mates using lawyers or letters to negotiate, avoiding childcare contact, and repeated fights and phone hang-ups are clear signs this has happened. Everyone loses.

        Typical ex mates have a history of painful interactions and disagreements, ranging from minor to massive. New conflicts between your co-parents are inevitable as your stepfamily merger evolves. Be-cause love has been replaced by indifference or distrust, disrespect, jealousy, anger, and/or fear, ex mates often judge each other as bad (unworthy, immoral, sick, selfish, uncooperative, spiteful, etc.)

        For your kids’ long-range welfare and your old-age contentment, I urge you to choose and promote the attitude that a “difficult” ex mate is wounded and unaware, (vs. stupid), not bad. This doesn’t mean you must accept or excuse toxic behavior from them. It means you can assert your needs, opinions, and boundaries respectfully (with an =/= R-message), vs. sending provocative “1-up” R-messages that will raise the ex’s defensiveness, resentment, hostility, and antagonism.

        When a child “acts out,” do you see her or him as a bad (unworthy, inept, unlovable) person, or do you focus on respectfully teaching them the impact of their actions? Your ex mate needs respect as much as you and your children do. My experience is that “disrespect” and “hostility” from an ex mate usually is a combination of hurt, anger, distrust, guilt, shame, and anxiety. These are often seasoned with incomplete grief, which is a sign of inner wounds and unawareness. Would you agree that none of these merit moral censure or scorn?

        A corollary: if experience and your values have taught you to view an ex mate as bad, sick, or evil, that will shape what you expect of her or him. If you expect conflict, selfishness, aggression, or the like, your attitude will leak and may unconsciously encourage behaviors like that.

        Notice your reaction to these ideas. Are your inner voices insisting that (a) someone's ex mate is bad and that (b) you shouldn’t or “can’t” view them as wounded and unaware instead? If so, I’d bet that a well-meaning false self is running your life - at least relative to the ex mate. Have you (and the ex mate) worked at Project 1 yet – honestly?

Status check: Overall, I feel our co-parents' attitudes about the value and dignity of each ex mate strengthens our family relationships and nurturance level now. (T  F  ?)

        Next, what’s your attitude about…

3)  Personal Responsibility vs. Blame

        If a storm causes a tree branch to break your window, would you growl “You’re a bad storm (or branch)?” If someone intentionally withholds relevant information or lies to you, do you blame them - judge them as wrong or bad? How do you usually feel when someone blames you for causing them discomfort, or for not behaving the way they wish?

        Thomas Gordon, the founder of Parent Effectiveness Training (PET), proposes that parents of an upset child get better long-term results when they ask themselves “Who’s problem (unfilled need) is this, yours, mine, or ours?” In co-parenting conflicts, change “child” to “ex mate,” and ask the same question.

        Premise: you and each of your co-parents are each ultimately responsible for filling your own needs. Do you agree? If an inner voice says “Yes, but…” suspect that a false self controls you. Implication: if an ex mate (or anyone) frustrates, hurts, attacks, or ignores you, your partner, and/or a child you care for, s/he is responsible for her or his actions, and you are responsible for possibly promoting those actions, and reacting to them. The reverse holds true too.

        As you know, our (perceived) behaviors affect other peoples’ comfort, and their behaviors affect ours. Human nature decrees that if you blame another for causing or prolonging your discomfort, s/he will feel hurt, frustrated, guilty, attacked, and/or angry if you express your judgment disrespectfully – or are perceived to do so.

        In a co-parenting conflict, each time your attitude is “It’s (my or your ex mate’s) fault, not mine!” you lower your chance to build an effective co-parenting team over time. Your kids are the biggest losers, followed by your older selves.

        Try this: in a recent or your next co-parenting conflict, ask yourself “What have I done that promoted the ex to act this way?” Dishonesty begets dishonesty, insecurity, and distrust. Disrespect breeds disrespect. In any problem with an ex mate or other co-parent you are almost  certainly half of the problem! The good news is, that means you can improve your half - if you choose to. You may promote the ex fixing his or her half if you dig down to identify what you really need, and assert it to them respectfully.

        Incidentally, your Inner Critic (subself) blaming you for a co-parenting problem breeds self-doubt, guilt, and shame. Lose-lose-lose.

        Note: if an ex mate in your family survived a low-nurturance childhood, s/he probably is burdened with excessive shame and guilts. Those can manifest as “having a hair trigger,” over-defensiveness, hypersensitivity, selfishness, conceit, lying, or “never owning responsibility or apologizing.” If you blame a co-parent for these traits as being bad, you...

miss the underlying causes, which the ex denies and can’t control until s/he chooses to heal. (see Project 1). 

invite increasing inner and family conflict, over time;

reduce your odds of co-parent teambuilding and lower your family’s nurturance level; and you....

risk unintentionally wounding your kids.

        Bottom line: for teambuilding success and a high-nurturance family, I encourage all your family adults to...

  • choose the attitude I am responsible for my half of any family (or other) conflicts,” and..

  • help each other replace false-self blaming with effective problem-solving. See Project 2. 

How's your motivation to do these now - honestly?

Status check: each of our co-parents consistently takes genuine responsibility for their half of significant conflicts among us now. (T  F  ?)

        Another key attitude that will shape your relationships:

4)  Is Divorce Morally Bad or Wrong?

        Over half of Americans who have married recently divorce legally or psychologically. Our Christian tradition decrees that we view (a) sanctioned marriage as a sacred commitment to our mate and God, and (b) infidelity, desertion, and divorce as morally wrong, and disobedience to God.

        As a young child, were you taught to not hurt other people - specially other kids? Do you still hold that value? Do you agree that divorce causes everyone affected, including minor and grown kids and grandparents, pain? Do you view legal or psychological divorce as a shameful failure or wrong?

Premise: If any of your co-parents or key supporters views divorce or divorced people as significantly wrong, bad, sinful or (shameful) “failures,” that toxic attitude will probably hinder your forming an effective co-parenting team over time, and lower the nurturance level of your family.

        This judgmental attitude about divorce promotes personal shame and guilt. These in turn foster...

  • false-self dominance (psychological wounds),

  • ineffective thinking, communicating, and problem-solving;

  • family loyalty conflicts and relationship  triangles; and...

  • anxieties, distraction, and incomplete grief.        

        Do any members of your extended family believe that divorcing families are “not as good as” intact biofamilies? Does anyone believe “kids of divorce don’t do as well,” or “are likely to divorce too”? I suggest there’s little constructive value in debating or “dis/proving” opinions like these. It‘s more useful to focus on the effects any such attitudes have on your co-parenting expectations, relationships, and teambuilding.

        I recommend you co-parents help other family members view divorces as…

  • sad and regrettable, not bad;

  • symptoms that one or both mates were/are unaware and significantly wounded, not bad or wrong;

  • a learning experience that has the potential to promote personal awareness, healing, and growth; and...

  • causing major losses that all family adults and kids need to grieve well, over many months.

        I further propose that the attitude that kids and adults in divorcing families are normal people with talents, limits, needs, and dreams, and an important set of personal and relationship adjustment tasks to master in addition to their normal developmental challenges. They are not inferior persons - they're burdened with major wounds, losses, and adjustment tasks that typical high-nurturance family members don't have.

Status check: our family adults' personal attitudes about divorce and divorced people clearly strengthen our stepfamily now. (T  F  ?)

Recall: we're reviewing 10 key attitudes that can improve or hinder your relations with your and/or your partner's ex mate. The next one is your attitude about...

5)  Re/marriage and Stepfamilies

        From tradition, media influence, and unawareness, your co-parents and supporters may have harmful attitudes about stepfamilies and their members:

“Remarried people couldn’t get it right the first time (there’s something wrong with them)”

“Stepfamilies are alien, abnormal, and not as good as traditional (intact bio) families.”

“Stepparents and stepkids are unnatural and second best compared to bioparents and their children.”

        Attitudes like these are toxic because they breed subtle or significant anxiety, pessimism, dishonesty, guilts, shame, and defensiveness. Because most divorcing-family and stepfamily co-parents seem to come from low-nurturance childhoods, they already wrestle with feeling unlovable, inept, and unworthy – specially if they view prior divorce as a (shameful) “failure.”

        A symptom of adults or kids holding attitudes like these is avoiding public admission of prior divorce, remarriage, and/or step-hood. (“We’re just a regular family…”)

        More nourishing attitudes sound like…

“Remarriage demonstrates the power of love and hope over fear, and the normal human longing to share the security, companionship, and joy of a committed primary relationship.”

Stepfamilies have the same potential for nurturance, security, pride, growth, and fellowship as any other kind of family. They are
different, not better or worse.”

’Stepparent’, stepchild, and stepsibling’ are roles,  not people. They are similar to, and different than, bioparent and biochild roles. There is nothing inherently inferior or superior about these ancient family roles.

        If all your (step)family members were together and undistracted, and someone read these attitudes out loud, what might happen?

Status check: Our family adults' attitudes about remarriage and stepfamilies clearly strengthens our relationships, loyalties, and unity now. (T  F  ?)

Concluded on page 2...

<< Previous page  /  Add to favorites  /