Break the [wounds + unawareness] cycle and guard your descendents

Pros and Cons of Co-parents
 Conceiving an "Ours" Child
- p. 1 of 2

Discuss this complex, impactful decision well!

By Peter K. Gerlach, MSW
Member NSRC Experts Council
 

colorbar.gif (1095 bytes)

 The Web address of this two-page article is http://sfhelp.org/Rx/spl/ourschild.htm

        Clicking links below will open a full window or an informational popup, so please turn off your browser's popup blocker or allow popups from this nonprofit Web site.

        This is one of over 150 articles focused on healing psychological wounds,  building high-nur-turance family relationships, breaking the [wounds + unawareness] cycle, and preventing divorce. This introduction describes the Web site's purpose and the best ways to use its resources. Each article is part of a mosaic of ideas, so the more you read, the more sense they'll all make.

        These articles augment, vs. replace, other qualified professional help. The "/" in re/marriage and re/divorce notes that it may be a stepparent's first union. "Co-parents" means both bioparents, or any of the three or more related stepparents and bioparents co-managing a multi-home nuclear stepfamily. 

        Before continuing, reflect: why are you reading this - what do you need?

+ + +

        This two-page Solutions article for co-parent mates is one of a sub-series that explores special stepfamily problems. It focuses on a decision that can wreck or strengthen a re/marriage: whether or not to conceive an "ours" child together. This choice is far more complex in typical stepfamilies than average intact biofamilies! The article covers (a) perspective, (b) four key questions about conception, and (c) co-parent options for making wise long-term decisions.

        The ideas here will make more sense if you first read...

  • This research summary about U.S. parents' lack of knowledge

  • This worksheet for couples considering child conception or adoption

  • These stepfamily basics and implications; and the...

  • Five interactive reasons millions of U.S. stepfamilies ultimately break up; and...

  • Factors that create a high-nurturance ("functional") family; and read...

  • Key components of a healthy relationship, and...

  • The primary causes of most stepfamily problems, and...

  • These premises about all stepfamily relationship problems.

colorbutton.gif Stepfamilies Are Complex!

        By definition, a multi-generational stepfamily is composed of one or more minor or grown stepkids, plus their one or two living bioparents, plus one or two stepparents, plus all the legal and blood relatives of three or more co-parents. Each stepparent may or may not have prior kids and living or dead former mates of their own.

        Forming of a stable extended stepfamily requires the enormously complex physical, emotional, and legal merger of three or more multi-generational biofamilies. This blending process usually takes four or more years to stabilize after re/wedding - longer, if both of a stepchild's divorced parents re/marry. As the merger proceeds, typical minor stepkids have four sets of concurrent developmental and family-adjustment needs, totaling (worst case) 40 to 60 concurrent needs they must fill for healthy young-adult independence.

        While helping your minor kids fill their mix of these overlapping needs, your co-parents face at least 30 adjustment needs that your peers in healthy intact biofamilies don't have - on top of your normal aging and personal-growth needs. Your extended stepfamily has up to 15 extra roles (e.g. step-uncle, half sister, non-custodial biodad,...) to negotiate, clarify, and stabilize, as you adjust the "regular" 15 biofamily roles (mother, niece, grandfather, cousin, son...).

        Your stepfamily is amazingly complicated in structure and dynamics. It will takes a long time after cohabiting and re/wedding to stabilize. Some stepfamilies never stabilize psychologically, financially, logistically, and legally. Millions re/divorce within 10 years after commitment, and millions more endure ongoing stress and discomfort rather than divorce.

        This inherent complexity makes deciding if and when to add a new child to the stepfamily unusually challenging and impactful. One way of adapting to that is to break the decision into parts:

colorbutton.gif Four Basic Questions

        Few typical co-parents are adequately informed of and prepared for the complexities and difficulties in merging their several families. One implication is that new partners should be extra thoughtful and honest about...

  • who wants to have a child?

  • why do you want an "ours" (vs. his or hers) child?

  • when?; and

  • how likely it is that you and your relatives can provide a consistently high-nurturance environment for a baby and all other nuclear-stepfamily members?

        Before looking at each of these, consider: "having a baby" really means "creating a human who will probably have kids, who will have kids, who..." Most babies will probably pass genes, values, traditions, and beliefs to a vast fan of offspring across many future generations. 

        If you have two kids, and each new generation bears two kids, in 12 generations your genetic progeny will number over 8,000 people, excluding death and infertility! So the wholistic health of the adult your baby becomes will genetically and socially affect thousands of future people. Notice your reaction! 

        With that in mind, take a look at...

Who Wants a Baby?

        "Motivation" is the quenchless human urge to fill significant current needs - emotional, physical, and spiritual discomforts. Each moment, you're aware of some needs, and unconscious of others. For you and your mate, making complex decisions like "Should I re/marry?" and "Shall we have a baby?" involves a mosaic of conscious (surface) and unconscious (primary) needs. These often oppose each other inside you and between you, which causes doubt, confusion, and stress.

        The complexity of your stepfamily merger makes it vital that you partners are as clear as possible on your primary needs before making a conception decision that will change your and your kids' lives forever. Have you ever identified and talked honestly about your respective needs? Did you see and hear your key caregivers do that when you were a child?

        My clinical experience with over 1,000 typical U.S. co-parents is that a high majority of us survived (unintentionally) low-nurturance childhoods. That usually means our thoughts, behaviors, and decisions are dominated by a "false self" without our knowing it. Among other things, that often means we...

  • automatically minimize and ignore our primary needs; or we...

  • assert them with significant guilt, ambivalence, and anxiety; or we...

  • often rank our needs as more important than other peoples' needs, and deny or justify that. 

        If you and/or your partner are ruled by a false self, you risk not knowing your combined current primary needs; often distorting reality without knowing it; and making impulsive or skewed decisions that you regret later. That's not a great framework for evaluating whether to co-create a new person!

        Has your mind ever created convincing reasons or impulses to act in ways you knew "weren't right"? Our well-intentioned false selves are wizards at conning us and each other into thinking, believing, and doing unhealthy and harmful things to gain short-term relief or pleasure. The preferable alternative is having your wise true Self make wise short and long-term decisions

        How can you and your mate tell whether your false self or true Self is urging you to conceive a child? Do safeguard Project 1 together honestly. It provides an effective way to assess for false-self wounds, and reduce any you find. 

        If you conclude that one or both of you has been controlled by a false self, then be skeptical about the long-term wisdom of your child-conception reasoning. When your true Selves are solidly in charge of your personalities, review the pros and cons above again thoroughly. See if you reach a different conclusion together. 

        Incidentally, if other adults and kids have significantly intense feelings and opinions about you mates possibly conceiving a child, use the 12 Project-1 checklists to estimate whether they are controlled by a false self. Your best stepfamily advisors will be solidly guided by their true Self and a benign (vs. "wrathful, jealous") Higher Power.

        A premise here is that a stepfamily "ours" child-conception decision is far more complex than in typical young biofamilies. Part of the complexity involves evaluating...


2) Why Do We Want An Ours Child?

        See how you feel about these premises:

Some reasons for conceiving a child are healthier (promoting personal growth, happiness, productivity, and serenity) than others;

Some conception reasons are universal, and others are unique and situational;

Ideally, child-conception decisions should consider (a) the wholistic health and welfare of the future child /adult; (b) plus conception and birth impacts on each bioparent + their relationship + others "significantly" affected by the new child's existence.

        See which of these co-parent reasons for conceiving an ours child are "healthy" for all four of these domains, in your situation: "I want us to conceive a baby to...

_ Please my mate

_ Give my child a brother/sister

_ Feel like a full, real wo/man

_ End my loneliness / emptiness

_ Please my (grand)parent/s

_ Pass on my genes, name, and wisdom

_ Have a life-long companion

_ Get or keep financial child support

_ Avoid missing one aspect of being fully human

_ See what it's like

_ (Re)gain stepfamily status and approval

_ Share one of life's most profound challenges
    and joys with my beloved partner

_ Improve the world

_ Get it right, this time

_ I reject abortion and/or adoption

_  

_ Be socially normal

_ Feel like a regular family

_ Fulfill God's purpose

_ Give me something to do

_ Strengthen our marriage

_ Avoid being old, sick, and alone

_ Avoid major regret when I'm old 

_ Give me a life purpose

_ Match my sibling/s or friend/s  

_ Beat the biological time clock

_ Get even with someone, or prove something to someone

_ Have the son/daughter I've longed for 

_ I want what your ex spouse had with you, so I can feel "equal"

_ Renew or save my marriage - ensure my mate doesn't abandon me/us

_  

        Which of these conscious child-conception motivations do you feel are "healthy" for you all? Are you ambivalent on any of them? Which of these motivates your partner? Whose motives (needs) are stronger? If you're a parent already, how have your child-conception motivations shifted since the first birth? Can you rank-order your reasons? Can your partner? Have you talked about your motives enough?

        Now consider... 

Why We Shouldn't Have an "Ours" Child (Now)

_ I / you don't want a(nother) child

_ We can't afford the expense

_ I'm / you seem too overwhelmed

_ We're not stable enough as a new couple, home, and stepfamily

_ I'm not clear on what really want, now

_ You're saying "yes" to please (someone)

_ We haven't enough family support

_ People I trust advise against it  

_ It's too big a genetic risk

_ I / you really don't want to go through the effort again

_ Child conception just doesn't "feel right" to me now

_ My son / daughter is strongly opposed to us having
   a baby

_ I dreamed / had a vision / have a strong hunch that (conception) isn't right for me / us

_  I am / you are too old

_  

_ We haven't got enough space

_ Your (my) ex mate may/will go ballistic

_ I'm not really sure we'll stay together 

_ I don't trust you and/or myself to be an adequate parent, in our situation

_ I'm not convinced you really want a child with me

_ Our parenting values are too different, and we can't seem to compromise

_ My / your health is too weak / fragile

_ We'd risk unacceptable disapproval and rejection from (who?) 

_ I don't trust (or agree with) your decision here 

_ My and/or your existing child(ren) are too needy and unstable

_ I / you don't really want to quit work / school

_ We're responsible for not adding another Earth-resource consumer

_ I don't trust our decision process; I'm / you're / we're too impulsive or needy

        Only you mates can decide how to rank and mix these pros and cons, and what's healthy enough for you each and all, short and long term. As you decide, you mates will want to know...


When Is The Right Time to Have an Ours Child?

        Reflect for a moment on your initial answer to that question. Is it general, like "When everyone's ready for it."? Though every stepfamily is unique, some universal factors shape the best time to conceive an "ours" child...

        1) Whether either of you carry significant false-self wounds. My experience since 1979 suggests that until well along in personal healing, wounded mates are at high risk of unintentionally being ineffective parents. So the best time to conceive is when you each agree your true Selves are solidly in charge. If either of you has a significantly wounded ex mate, that will almost surely lower the nurturance-level of the family your baby will grow up in.

        2) How knowledgeable your co-parents are. I propose that one of the five reasons for widespread American psychological and legal re/divorce is co-parent unawareness of how to cope effectively with these 11 core stepfamily stressors. When all three or more of your co-parents  can (a) describe each stressor knowledgeably as it pertains to you all, and (b) outline specifically what to do about it, you may be prepared to decide on having a child together.

        Another conception-timing factor is...

        3) How well along you all are in combining your several biofamilies and stabilizing your complex web of roles and relationships. A newborn will send emotional, financial, logistic, structural, and perhaps legal shockwaves throughout your stepfamily system.

        If your scores of steprelatives are "pretty well adjusted" to your complex biofamily merger, then having an "ours" child probably won't swamp your stepfamily boat. A specially important factor here is how well ex mates and stepparents have overcome their mix of these typical co-parental barriers so far.
 

        Measuring these stabilities objectively isn't easy. A rough rule of thumb is - if it takes average stepfamilies at least four years to stabilize after each co-parent re/wedding, then having an "ours" child within about three years after your nuptials is significantly risky.

        Another way of estimating whether the safety and stability of your stepfamily environment is high enough to support all the changes an "ours" baby will bring is to assess your stepfamily strengths now. If they're low, I recommend holding off on cribs and diapers. That's specially true if your four levels of personal and stepfamily support are "low" also.

        A final conception-timing factor is...

        4) How well you mates have considered everyone's primary needs in this complex stepfamily decision. Some co-parents false selves feel child conception is "nobody's business but ours." That's risky in a multi-home stepfamily where many kids and adults will be significantly affected for many years. 

        If you choose to conceive, you won't know the wisdom of your decision for some years. Your long-range outcome will be directly proportion to (a) how well you've informed all affected family members of your conception evaluation, and (b) how well you've learned and balanced their primary (vs. surface) needs with yours. It takes time to do that thoroughly! This is not giving the decision to other people (specially kids!), but it is deepening the knowledge base from which to make your impactful decision.

Continue with the fourth basic conception question, and a summary of key options...
 

<<  Previous page  /  Add to favorites  /  Print page  /  Email this article's address  >>

colorbar

 home  /  site overview  /  directory  /  site map  /  Q&A  /  quizzes  /  solutions  /  site search  /  glossary

  research  /  free course  /  guidebooks  NEW  forums resources  /  feedback  and/or  subscribe  * copyright info

Updated August 25, 2008