Project 1 of 12 - assess for false-self wounds and reduce them


Improve Self and Mutual Trust
 
p. 1 of 4

Shift Daily Anxiety Toward Serenity

By Peter K. Gerlach, MSW

HRbrass.gif (3108 bytes)

  • home > site overview > site map, directory, or search > Q&A, Project-1 links, Solutions article, or other page > here

The Web address of this four-page article is http://sfhelp.org/Rx/wounds/distrust.htm

        Clicking links below will open a full window or an informational popup, so please turn off your brow-ser's popup blocker or allow popups from this nonprofit Web site.

        This is one of over 150 articles focused on healing psychological wounds, building high-nurtur-ance family relationships, breaking the [wounds + unawareness] cycle, and preventing divorce. This intro-duction describes the Web site's purpose and the best ways to use its resources. Each article is part of a mosaic of ideas, so the more you read, the more sense they'll all make. These articles augment, vs. replace, other qualified professional help.

        Before continuing, reflect: why are you reading this - what do you need?

+ + +

        The scope of U.S. social problems like divorce, addictions, obesity, welfare, crime, homeless-ness, abortions, and "mental illness" suggests that well over half of typical American adults are signifi-cantly wounded and unaware.  

        This is one of a series of Web articles about assessing for and reducing two to six common psy-chological wounds. Typical lay and professional people aren't aware of what causes these wounds (a low-nurturance childhood and social denial), or what the wounds mean to them, their descendents, and our society. This article focuses on understanding and reducing the wound of "trust disorders."    

 Contents

        This four page article provides practical options for...

identifying and reducing "trust disorders,"

improving self-trust and trustworthiness, and...

regaining lost trust in/of other people.

The article starts with initial readings and way to learn your "trust profile." Then it answers...

Part 1 - Q&A About Trust

Part 2 - Trust Rebalancing Options

 Read These First

        To get the most from this article, you'll need to know these basic concepts...

  • an introduction to normal personality subselves - slides or text;

  • common questions and answers about subselves;

  • common behavioral traits of true-Self and false-self personality-leadership;

  • an overview of six common false-self (psychological) "wounds;"

  • an introduction to wound reduction ("recovery") - slides or text; and...

  • an overview of the [wounds + unawareness] cycle that may stress your family and descendents - slides or text

        After you've studied these ideas, learn about yourself. Get undistracted and create...

Your "Trust Profile"

        Get undistracted and centered, and meditate on these statements. T = true, F = false, and "?" = "I'm not sure," or "It depends on (what?)..."

  • I know all I need to know about trust now (T  F ?)

  • I can _ clearly define trust, and _ explain where it comes from (T  F ?)

  • I can name at least 10 things I need to trust about myself now (T  F ?)

  • I trust myself enough in most situations now (T  F ?)

  • Awareness of my trust in _ myself, _ other key people, and _ a Higher Power is usually a high priority for me (T  F ?)
     

  • I was encouraged  to trust my _ competence, _ perceptions, and _ decisions as a child.  (T  F ?)

  • I steadily trust in a benign, responsive Higher Power now.  (T  F  ?)

  • I trust my _ mate, _ parent/s, _ sibling/s, and _ children enough at this time.  (T  F ?)

  • I know how to handle personal betrayals effectively now.  (T  F  ?)

  • I have never betrayed any important adult or child.  (T  F  ?)

  • I’m clear on my options for regaining lost trust now (T  F ?)
     

  • I’m comfortable enough talking about trust problems with other people now (T  F ?)

  • I can describe clearly why I’m reading this article.  (T  F ?)

  • My true Self is in charge of my personality now.  (T  F ?)

      Pause and notice your thoughts and feelings now. Then review these basic ideas with the open mind of a student...

PART 1 - Q&A about Trust  and Distrust

        Compare these premises with what you believe so far...

  What Is trust?

       Think of an adult you totally trust. Then identify someone you distrust. What’s the difference bet-ween those people? I propose that trust is an automatic (semi-conscious) judgment, attitude, and expec-tation we adults and kids make about ourselves and others, starting in infancy. It is powered by our pri-mal need for safety - i.e. our instinctive drive to avoid pain and injury.

        People who have consistently "sound" judgment and who have never been betrayed (had their trust "broken") may not worry much about trust. Do you know anyone who hasn't been let down, lied to, mis-led, cheated, disillusioned, back-stabbed, conned, used, manipulated, or betrayed by someone impor-tant to them? By God? By an organization? Would some adult or child say that you've done any of those to them?

         Complete trust says "I can absolutely count on (someone or something) to be or act in a certain way that (affects my physical, emotional, or spiritual security.)" For example, I trust that the sun will rise tomorrow (again) to warm and light my world, and that there will (again) be oxygen enough for me all day. 

         From our primal need for safety, our language includes trust-related words like (un)reliable, con-fidence, (un)faithful, assurance, pledge, promise, contract, reliance, vow, promise, (un)certainty, doubt, (un)sure, betrayal, worry, cynic(al), skeptic(al), pessimism, and (dis)honesty. Our laws promote trust in each other and organizations, partly by threatening significant pain to those who break legal or ethical promises.

        Trust in ourselves, each other, and the universe varies in degree and scope. I can trust you to make a delicious omelet, but not to always tell me the truth about your spending our money. I can trust myself to drive a car without crashing, but not to always remember your birthday. Trust and distrust are ultimate-ly a measure of faith about how we or another will behave in a predictable or (un)desired way. Paradox - "I trust that I can't trust you about _____"

         Trust can only grow naturally, if conditions are right, over significant time. Like love, respect, inter-est, and bonding, it cannot be requested, demanded, decreed, bought, or bartered for. "You should trust me" is a Be-spontaneous! paradox. One implication is: if you and/or an adult or child have lost trust in the other, it may not be possible to rebuild it "well enough" for both people. Time and motivation will tell.

q-mark.gif (70 bytes)  What is distrust?

        As we newborns experience significant discomforts (unmet needs), distrusts begin to form. Paradoxically, distrust is trusting that something or someone is unsafe - i.e. that...

  • they will not satisfy current primary needs, and/or that...

  • they won't satisfy our needs in a way that feels "good enough."

Distrusts inhibit spiritual and human intimacy by blocking us from revealing our true thoughts, feelings, and needs. Chronic suspicion and jealousy suggest a significant trust disorder - i.e. false-self dominance in one or all  people involved.

q-mark.gif (70 bytes)  What is "betrayal"?

        Here it means "expecting someone (including our ruling subselves) to fill important needs, and find-ing that they don't." The most agonizing betrayals (e.g. parental neglect and marital affairs) are those which send the glaring public message "I don't care about you or your welfare."

        Shame-based (wounded) people are highly sensitive to such betrayals, or have learned to be pro-tectively "indifferent" to (numb and deny) them because their childhoods were full of painful betrayals they didn't cause, and couldn't understand or prevent

  Where does trust come from?

         Pause and try answering this question out loud. Then compare your idea with this premise: in inter-personal relationships, trust comes from needs + direct experience + hopes +  assumptions.

        Needs.  Our earliest experience of dis/trust occurs in infancy. We're entirely dependent on giant adults to know and fill our current physical and developmental needs. If they do so reliably and effectively, we grow wordless trust that they value us and want to help us feel safe and comfortable.

        If our needs are met erratically, harshly, or inadequately, we grow wordless distrust about (a) our own worth, (b) the reliability and intentions of our caregivers, and (c) the safety of the universe

        As we age, we slowly become more capable of filling many of our own needs, and we can become increasingly selective about which other people we trust for maintaining our safety and comfort. An ines-capable challenge is whether we learn to trust our own abilities to fill our needs in different situations or not (self trust). 

        Hopes ("faith"). Hope-based trust is faith in something without direct experience validating it. A primal example is hope for (faith in) an afterlife free of Earthly suffering, and reunion with God, ancestors, and beloved friends and hero/ines.

        Experience. Your trusts also come from repeated observations over time – e.g. "In 22 years, Pat has never broken a promise to me." So if trust is lost, we need repeated experiences, vs. verbal assur-ances, to rebuild it.

        Another implication: in some relationships we start out unsure or distrusting, and may reverse that to some extent over time based on accumulated experiences: “When we met, I was uneasy hearing that my future stepson had been recently caught shoplifting, but since our re/wedding, he’s never done that again.

        Assumptions. Trust also comes from believing certain sources of information: e.g.

"Pastor Lueking would never lie to me!"

The mail carrier will never read my personal mail.

I trust my doctor to assess me accurately and prescribe the right thing.

     We also assume the reasonableness of some things: “I trust that Martha will never run for President, become an exotic dancer, or shave her head.”

     Can you think of other sources of the trust (faith) that you award to living and spiritual things and Na-tural laws?

   Who causes or blocks trust?

        This educational site is based on the old premise that normal human personalities are composed of a group of subselves who behave chaotically to harmoniously. A corollary is that one of your subselves is a naturally talented leader – your Self (capital "S"). If less talented subselves distrust your Self, they usurp personality leadership and can be called your false self because they inexpertly direct your thoughts, perceptions, needs, and behaviors.

        From this perspective, the question above becomes two queries:

  • Do all your active subselves solidly trust your Self’s judgment and ability? (self-trust)”, and…

  • If ‘you’ (your ruling subselves) distrust another person in some ways, which subselves are distrustful, and why?”

        To permanently improve some trust aspect of a key relationship, you’ll need to answer each of these alien questions. They’re not simple, and merit their own guidebook: Who’s Really Running Your Life?  (Xlibris.com, 2002, 2nd ed.). Let’s say summarily that…

        “Growing up” (maturing) and “personal recovery from early psychological wounds” (family Project 1) are trust-building processes. They hinge on accumulating experience that all your subselves’ can rely on (a) the wisdom and judgment of your Self and Higher Power, and (b) the ability of your team of subselves, to keep you safe and “happy” enough day by day.

        As a veteran inner-family therapist and wound-recoverer, my experience is that each of your sub-selves has it’s own level of trust (low > high) in your Self, your inner family, your mate (if any), key adults and kids, and your Higher Power. Some subselves trust more than others. That promotes normal or ex-cessive confusion, ambivalence, doubt, anxiety, and uncertainty.

        A key implication is: to (re)build inner trust in yourself (i.e. lower self-doubt, and raise self con-fidence), your Self will need to identify which subselves are distrustful, and work with them respectfully to change their beliefs. Another implication: rebuilding lost trust in another person requires you to...

  • identify your distrustful subselves and learn what they need,

  • assert those needs to appropriate people effectively, and then...

  • the other person wanting to change and fill your needs and their own equally.

My experience is that until their true Self guides her or his personality, the latter is unlikely. Note what your reigning subselves are “saying” now – i.e. notice your thought streams, images, and feelings.

  What are pseudo and blind trust?

        Have you ever experienced a double massage from someone? These are every-day evidences that different subselves in us have different opinions, motives, perceptions, and goals. Another common symp-tom is first-order (superficial) changes, like dieting earnestly and then regaining the lost weight over and over again.

        In the same way, some of your subselves may trust your Self and certain other kids and adults and  some don’t. That causes pseudo trust: declaring or acting like you trust, but other actions imply you don’t (a double message). For instance, you may say sincerely “I trust that you love and need me,” and suffer episodes of feeling unloved and unimportant.

        A widespread false-self wound is reality distortion, like denials, repressions, “forgetting,” intellectual-izing, rationalizing, idealizing, projecting, and so on. Pseudo trust results from some subselves trying val-iantly to protect you from the pain of facing that (a) you don’t or can’t trust someone you want to depend   on, or (b) you’re unable to trust in a balanced, healthy way.

        A similar phenomenon is blind faith or trust: rigidly avoiding or ignoring facts and experiences that clearly say to other knowledgeable people “you’re trust is misplaced.” Blind faith is an example of rigid black/white thinking, which often indicates false-self dominance. Do you know anyone who denies that a loved one is addicted, emotionally unstable, sick, self-destructive, or criminal?

        Are there any fanatics or zealots among the people you know? How about “eternal optimists”? Such cases imply that there are ruling subselves who cannot tolerate the pain of facing that trust (security) in some precious person, perception, or concept isn’t really justified. Restated: it’s possible to trust too much.

        Recall that one of five symptoms of significant false-self domination is “trust distortions”: i.e. not trusting safe people or a reliable Higher Power, or repeatedly trusting unsafe people and getting betrayed. In each of these cases, dis/trust and/or the other person’s behaviors are surface problems. The primary (underlying) problem is inadequate early-childhood nurturance, and unawareness of a disabled true Self.

  How is trust lost?

        Can you recall having significant trust in a person, group, or belief, and losing it? Do you remember how that happened? The most memorable trust-losses are sudden traumatic discoveries, like learning that a mate is having an affair, using drugs covertly, has a terminal illness, or is molesting a child.

        Distrust can grow from unremarkable events that accumulate over time. We grow hunches or feel-ings that “something’s not right here” without clear or dramatic evidence. This can come from our trusted person’s need to hide their (shameful) behaviors, and/or our need to hide from the painful reality that the other person is not who we thought they were (or need them to be).

        I've experienced hundreds of therapy cases where one or both partners had gradually lost trust in the other, and/or lost faith that their relationship could survive. Do you know anyone like that?

  How do we react when trust is lost?

     Each of us develops a strategy for reacting to lost trust. Do you know what your strategy is? See if you recognize it among these:

Avoiding full trust in the first place, and pretending this isn’t true.

Distrusting your own perceptions and emotions, and/or your ability to trust appropriately.

Generalizing. “All females / males / gypsies / (etc.) are basically conniving, selfish, and deceitful.”

Minimizing, denying, pretending, or explaining lost trust without much feeling. Related false-self strategies are emotional numbing, and self-comforting via an addiction.

Blaming someone else for our loss of trust, and denying our half of the action. (“Your sexual affair proves you’re a morally weak, corrupt person.”) This may be embellished by choosing a comforting martyr or victim role.

Blaming ourselves and not seeing a partner’s half in losing faith (“If I had been a better sexual partner, Jamie wouldn’t have had the affair.”) This can manifest as feeling guilty and/or ashamed for choosing an untrustworthy partner, or for losing faith in them. Or your strategy may be...

Acknowledging lost trust, and not doing anything about it – i.e. ignoring the needs that distrust creates, and/or avoiding scary confrontations and other choices required to fill those needs (“Marian, if you forget to fill the tank one more time, I’m going to ask you for your ignition key.”) A major case of this is not grieving our loss. (“I’ve got too much to do to be sad, these days.”) Or...

Denying or not seeking patterns in the trusts we form or lose, over time (“It’s too weird: I’ve picked three dishonest partners in a row. Am I under some curse or spell?”)

Adopting and denying pseudo or blind trust, rather than admitting an agonizing or terrifying loss of faith.

“Getting depressed” – calling healthy grief over lost trust "depression," and perhaps seek-ing medication or therapy for it. Another strategy is...

“Anxiety attacks” – focusing on the effects of lost trust (less security), rather than the cause/s, and taking responsibility for healthy reactions.

(a) Admitting lost trust without blame, (b) learning from it, (c) assessing current needs, and (d) acting responsibly and compassionately to fill them. (“Carlos is terribly wounded and in denial. He wants  to tell me the truth, but his false self often won’t let him. He’s not in a place yet to recognize and change that. I can’t control that, and I need a partner I can trust.”)

Some combination of these, and/or other strategies.

        What do you notice about these responses to lost trust? What I notice is that only the last one is wholistically healthy, and the others imply a dominant false self. For perspective, recall that the benefit of real trust is security – feeling safe from pain, injury, and/or overwhelm. Your true Self and inner advisors  are competent to adapt to lost trust, and rebuild securities - if your other subselves will trust them to do that…

 Continue with trust-balancing goals and options. Do you need a stretch break first?

+ + +

<<  Previous page  /  Add to favorites  /  Print page  /  Email this article's address  >>

colorbar

 home  /  site overview  /  directory  /  site map  /  Q&A  /  quizzes  /  solutions  /  site search  /  glossary

  research  /  free course  /  guidebooks  NEW  forums resources  /  feedback  and/or  subscribe  * copyright info

Updated  July 05, 2008