Help each other identify and fill your primary needs

Premises About Relationship "Problems"

How do these compare with your beliefs?
p. 1 of 2

By Peter K. Gerlach MSW

  • home > site overview > site map, directory, or search > Q&A, Solutions articleProject 10 links, or other page > here

The Web address of this two-page article is http://sfhelp.org/basics/premises-rlnprob.htm

        Clicking links below will open a full window or an informational pop-up, so please turn off your browser's popup blocker or allow popups from this nonprofit Web site.

        This is one of over 150 articles focused on building high-nurturance family relationships and preventing divorce. This introduction describes the Web site's purpose and the best ways to use its resources. Each article is part of a mosaic of ideas, so the more you read, the more sense they'll all make. These articles augment, vs. replace, other qualified professional help.

        Before continuing, reflect: why are you reading this - what do you need?

+ + +

        All relationships create conflicts or problems - clashing values, perceptions, needs, and preferen-ces. Divorce, parent/spouse death, and remarriage cause lots of simultaneous conflicts for all kids and adults involved.

        This article proposes 21 premises about solving any relationship problem. The premises are about (a) you, and (b) resolving problems. I invite you to read these thoughtfully to discover what you believe. Your beliefs, attitudes, and communication skills will shape how well you're able to identify and fill your personal and social needs in any situation. A = "I agree," D = "I disagree," and ? = "I'm not sure," or "It depends" (on what?)

Premise 1:  The clearer you are on your set of basic beliefs and attitudes like these, the more you'll feel centered, serene, confident, calm, and productive in any life situation.  (A  D  ?) Moral: intentionally develop self-awareness!

Premise 2:  Regardless of age, gender, and setting, mutually-satisfying relationships usually have most of these four sets of ingredients. (A  D  ?)  Option - Use the linked summary to help identify missing ingredi-ents in your significant relationships.


 Premises About You

Premise 3: You are a truly unique, worthwhile person. Each other person in your life was and is just as unique and worthy in their own way. You have an intrinsic potential value to you, as judged by yourself and others. Anyone who needs to label you as "worthless" or "bad" probably feels that about themselves, but can't own that yet. (A  D  ?)

        Your worth comes from your natural capacity to promote wholistic health and growth, peace, safety, comfort, and love in living things, starting with yourself and those who depend on you. Your personal worth does not depend on whether you make other people "happy," no matter what others say or imply. We each are ultimately responsible for our own periods of happiness, and we can help each other find, enjoy, and extend them. (A  D  ?)

Premise 4: Being unique means that you have talents and abilities (gifts) which you may or may not recognize, develop, and use. Doing these bring periods of fulfillment and satisfaction ("happiness") over time. Other people have different (vs. better) gifts than yours. You have no control over what talents you're born with. You can control what you do with them. (A  D  ?)

Premise 5: You and others have inherent limitations which you didn't cause and can't change. You can...

  • calmly acknowledge, accept, and adapt to your limits; or...

  • feel guilty, ashamed, or angry about them, and minimize, project, and/or deny them.

The latter never promotes personal peace, health, productivity, and joy, long term. If your limitations cause a problem for others, it is their responsibility to resolve that, not yours - unless you're wounded and/or you've chosen to lie about yourself. Their disappointment or frustration with your limits is your problem to accept or to act to change. (A  D  ?)

Premise 6: all normal people (like you) have one personality. It is composed of talented subselves, like the players in an orchestra or sports team. Each subself has unique abilities, limitations, needs, and values, and is dedicated to your survival. All of them together form an inner family which behaves just like your "outer" (physical) family. They cause your thoughts, hunches, dreams, moods, and behaviors moment to moment and over time. (A  D  ?)

        For more perspective on your subselves, read this and return. If you're skeptical (or curious) about this idea, read this memo to you with an open mind, and try this safe, interesting exercise. Then return here. If you still scoff at the idea of normal personality subselves, the articles in this non-profit Web site will be of little use to you. 

Premise 7: Your human relationships range from none through ambivalent to close / intimate to primary. Each relationship's rank is based on your exchange of mutual respect and admiration; your mutual need-fulfillment (premise 2); the compatibility of your respective interests, styles, (e.g. conservative > liberal), and wounds; and the degree of your  bonding. (A  D  ?) 

  See this for more premises about persons and relationships.


 Premises About Relationship Problems

Premise 8:  Here, the word problem means "one or more unmet needs in one or more personality subselves or people." A need is a significant physical, psychological, or spiritual discomfort. We kids and adults semi-consciously seek to get and keep personal balance and peace by acting to fill enough of our current needs, which change all the time. (A  D  ?)
 
Premise 9: all human relationships are powered by each partner trying to fill their main current primary needs well enough. Thus permanently solving your inner-personal and interpersonal (social) relationship problems hinges on all partners identifying and filling their current primary (vs. surface or secondary) needs well enough. (A  D  ?)

Premise 10: Your and my needs are...

neither good nor bad, like our eye color or fingerprints. The way we act to fill our needs can be "good" or "bad," if our attitudes and behaviors cause discomfort or block health and growth in someone. Many of us were taught to shame ourselves or others for being "too needy." That's like labeling a person bad or weak for needing to breathe. (A  D  ?)

conscious, semi-conscious, and unconscious. Our conscious needs are usually on the "surface" of our awareness ("I need the car now"). There are usually deeper semi-conscious and unconscious primary needs ("I need the security of knowing now that I have a reliable way of getting to the bank and back, so I'll have cash to handle unexpected expenses.") Effective problem-solving requires discerning and filling primary needs!  (A  D  ?)

        And human needs...

interact - my emotional, physical, and spiritual needs cause and affect yours, and vice versa (A  D  ?); and our needs...

are satisfied temporarily; then may recur (A  D  ?). And our needs...

come in complex clusters. At any moment, you and others have groups of minor to major emotional, physical, and spiritual surface and primary needs that vary in priority (discomfort) and constantly shift and interact (A  D  ?). And your needs...

follow a natural ranking or hierarchy - i.e. we semi-consciously rank some needs as more important than others. Our priorities shift, with age, wisdom, and circumstance. (A  D  ?)

Premise 10Key factors in the outcome of any relationship problem are...
  • what each person's current primary (vs. surface) needs are, and...

  • how each person ranks their and their partner's needs at the moment and over time. 

Inner and mutual peace may happen when all partners genuinely believe "Your and my needs are equally important to me now, so let's help each other fill them." This site calls this an equal/equal ("=/=") or win-win attitude. Most social frustrations, conflicts, and divorces happen because partners (i.e. their ruling subselves) (a) don't identify and own their primary needs, and (b) don't genuinely rank their needs or values as =/=, over time. (A  D  ?)

        Corollary: a key parental task is to patiently, lovingly guide minor kids to change their natural egocentric "My needs come first" instincts to "Your and my needs rank equally with me now." The latter attitude is a trait of true maturity. Adults can't teach that if they don't model it spontaneously. (A  D  ?)

 Recall - these 21 premises are core beliefs that shape how effectively partners view and try to resolve their "relationship problems." This effectiveness takes conscious effort to achieve (e.g. work at Project 2), and is vital for building a high-nurturance family and life.

More premises...

Premise 11: Most significant relationship "problems" have four parts:

Jack's surface needs Jill's surface needs
Jack's primary needs Jill's primary needs

        Unless Jack and Jill (a) are clearly aware of all four parts and (b) agree to brainstorm filling their respective primary needs as teammates, lasting win-win problem-solving (need satisfaction) is unlikely. 

       For example: if Jack says "You never listen to me" and Jill dutifully or anxiously tries to improve her listening, Jack may remain dissatisfied because his unspoken primary need is to feel more valued and respected by Jill. That would take spontaneous (vs. requested or demanded) new behaviors from Jill. It also might take Jack reducing his old shame wound, which has nothing to do with Jill.

        Most partners aren't used to digging down to identify their and a partner's primary needs. This leaves them focused on surface (secondary) needs and/or attacking each other as persons ("arguing") vs. teaming up to help each other fill their respective needs equally.  (A  D  ?)

To make this concept more real, study this comparison of common stepfamily surface problems and primary causes for them.

Premise 12: Needs can conflict concurrently within us and between us.

        One implication of normal false-self dominance is frequent inner fights. One personality subself may want their host person to act (thought stream: "Come on, come on, pick up the phone and call!"), and one or more other subselves may urge "No, no! You'll probably get lectured at and rejected again, which will hurt. Don't call!" Ring any bells? For most of us, these inner squabbles are so common we're not even aware of them. They distract and defocus us, and use up lots of energy ("Why am I so tired all the time...")

        When people (like you) develop awareness they can start to recognize these semi-conscious inner struggles. In recovery from false-self wounds, they (you) can quiet and sort out all the inner voices and invoke the skill and wisdom of your true Self to mediate and reach acceptable inner compromises. That paves the way for outer compromise.

        A challenging implication of this is that a "problem" between two mates, co-workers, and adults and kids can really be a whole cluster of concurrent inner and mutual conflicts:

Jack's conscious
surface needs
<< conflict >> Jill's conscious
surface needs
Jack's semi-conscious
<<
conflicting primary needs >>
Jill's' semi-conscious
<<
conflicting primary needs >>

In major internal and interpersonal conflicts, the learnable communication skills of awareness, clear thinking, and "digging down" empower you to discern your and your partner's underlying primary needs.
(A  D  ?) Learning to do this is part of family Project 2.  

        Before continuing, pause and reflect. Why did you start to read this article? Are you getting what  you needed? What are you learning from these basic premises about you, relationships, and human "problems"? Take a break if you need to, and then...

Continue with relationship-problem premise 13...
 

<<  Prior page  /  Add to favorites  /  Print page  /  Email this article's address  >>

colorbar

 home  /  site overview  /  directory  /  site map  /  Q&A  /  quizzes  /  solutions  /  site search  /  glossary

  research  /  free course  /  guidebooks  forum  /  resources  /  feedback  and/or  subscribe  * copyright info

Updated May 04, 2008