GWC response examples,
continued...
Assert Your Needs and Limits
This option extends the prior one by using a respectful three-part
"I-message" (assertion):
-
a factual description of the GWC's offensive action/s,
-
specifically how they affect you and your relationship, and...
-
a clear
description of what you need from - or won't tolerate with - the wounded
person.
This response is most apt to satisfy your needs if
(a) your Self is solidly
(b)
you feel genuine compassion for the adult or child, (c) you're clear on your
personal rights, and (d) you've
your current primary needs. This option can sound like this:
"(Name),
are
you open to some feedback from me?" Be prepared for "No." If you
get a nod or "Yes," then say something like...
"Nisha, when you interrupt
me so often, I feel disrespected and frustrated, and I lose interest in
talking with you. If you keep interrupting me, I'm going to confront
you every time you do."
"Jake, when you choose to
swear often and talk so loudly, I feel distracted, and have trouble
hearing what you're trying to say. I need you to stop swearing, and
talk more softly with me. If you choose not to do that, I'll walk away."
"Marla, your perfume
is so strong it distracts me from focusing on what we're talking about.
If you choose to make no change, I'm going to mention this to you
every time we talk, from now on."
If you've described subselves and
false-self wounds to the person, you can refer to that in your assertion
- e.g. ...
"Alex, when you don't let me
know you're going to be late, you're probably controlled by your false
self. I feel irritated and discounted when you ignore my needs, and
I
need you to want to
and to stop wasting my
time."
If you set a specific consequence or limit with the other person, you need
to enforce it consis-tently, or remain in a
role in your
relationship.
How does this response option compare with how you normally react to
obnoxious (wounded) people?
Special
Cases
The options above apply to
any significantly-wounded person. Some relationships
merit special awareness and perspective, like relating to a wounded mate, ex
mate, minor child, parent or relative, and co-worker. Let's look at each of these
briefly...
Relating to a Wounded Mate
This is the most difficult case, because the
are so high. The best
time to assess a partner for significant false-self wounds is during
courtship - specially if prior kids are involved. An inherent block to this
is (a) needy, unaware GWCs often unconsciously choose each other, and (b)
minimize, deny, or ignore any warning signs of false-self dominance.
Prior divorces, affairs, wounded ex mates, addictions, chronic financial,
legal, and/or occupational problems, and ex-mate hostility and legal
battles, all suggest (vs. prove) significant wounds and una-wareness.
For more perspective and options, see these courtship
danger signs, and this
article for com-mitted partners.
Relating to a Wounded Ex Mate
If you're psychologically or legally divorced and you have no mutual minor
kids, you may not need to relate to your former partner other than to
finalize your settlement. If you co-conceived or adopted kids, you'll need
to maintain a co-parental relationship for their sakes for many years.
Typical divorces breed major distrust, dislike, disrespect, impatience,
disinterest, and hostility
between exes and some in-laws. Those are
usually symptoms that both
adults are
and
are used to being ruled often by a false self.
Parenting values and responsibilities and the kids' welfare can be ongoing
sources of conflict be-tween wounded ex mates - specially if they don't know
effective communication
Relating to each other with patience and
compassion requires each adult to want to
forgive themselves and each other for
prior hurts, and to steadily separate their personal relationship stressors
from child-related goals and problems. That requires their true Selves to be
steadily in charge.
|
When former partners choose a new mate (a stepparent
with or without their own kids), family relationships become extra
complex. This is specially
true if the new partner is an unaware, unrecov-ering GWC - which seems to be the current American norm. |
Use this
of articles and these
Q&A items to help manage these complex
co-parenting roles and relationships well. This
article offers more detail on relating
effectively to a wounded ex mate.
Relating to a Wounded Minor Child
Our troubled culture is largely unaware of the [wounds + unawareness]
and its many toxic effects. So significantly-wounded kids are often
labeled problem children, brats, trouble makers, out-casts,
losers, delinquents, misfits, bullies, sissies, wimps, scaredy cats, babies,
stupid, lazy, selfish, "bad seeds," black sheep, and "good-for-nothings."
These shaming labels starkly indicate adult ignorance, and tragically
increase the excessive shame, guilt, anxiety, and hopelessness
that typical minor children of GWCs feel.
The first thing to do in relating well to a wounded minor child is to
objectively assess (a) the nurtur-ance level of their home and family, and
(b) the degree of wounding and unawareness in each of their older
caregivers. Then reexamine your expectations of the child, for you may
assume s/he "should" be-have like kids from idealized high-nurturance
environments. That's like scorning a poodle for not beha-ving like a dolphin.
If you can acknowledge (a) a child's psychological wounds and unawareness, and
(b) that they
didn't choose these, and (c) don't know what to do about them, you can see "misbehavior"
and "bad at-titudes" with compassion and empathy, rather than
frustration, criticism, anger, impatience, and ridi-cule. That does not
mean excusing kids from the consequences of their attitudes and behavior.
For more perspective and options
for relating well to a wounded minor child, see this
article.
Relating to a
Wounded Parent or Relative
A universal challenge for all GWCs is relating well-enough to the wounded,
unaware adults that raised them. "Relating well enough" means consistently
filling your current relationship needs well
enough in various situations.
Once again, the first step is to
of your
subselves. Until you do, it's likely that your Scared, Guilty, Lost,
Obedient, and Abandoned
and their
will dominate you
around your parents and grandparents ("I feel just like I used to around
them.")
Then you may validate your rights as a mature
adult, and authorize yourself to hold different values and opinions than
your parents - even if that offends and disappoints them.
Deciding if, when, and how to respectfully confront childhood caregivers
with their wounds and una-wareness is hard. Until you do, chances for honest,
satisfying (vs. dutiful or pretended) relationships with them are low.
That's specially frustrating if you want your own kids to benefit from
nourishing grand-parental relations.
To achieve genuine compassion, accept that your wounded parents and
grandparents didn't get their needs met well enough as kids because
their ancestors and society were wounded and ignorant. Part of
effective adult wound-reduction is grieving the loss of a
wholistically-healthy, high-nurturance childhood. That requires
acknowledging what specific developmental needs
didn't get met, why, and what those losses have meant in your life.
False selves often bitterly blame parents for not providing what they
"should have." Real (vs. pseu-do)
progress shifts
blame and resentment toward
grief, and genuine compassion for their disadvantaged ancestors. Sometimes,
grieving childhood losses requires honest
with parents ("I
never felt I could trust you to listen to me without correcting me.").
Do this to vent, not to punish, whine, or complain.
A key challenge to overcome in forging honest relationships with wounded
relatives is letting go of the ancient decree "You
must respect your elders," without guilt or shame.
Respect, trust, love, and honor,
must be earned, no matter whose genes and name you carry!
A future article will explore healthy recovery-confrontations with wounded
parents and relatives. Meanwhile, use the guidelines above and
this.
A final special case to consider is...
Relating to a Wounded Co-worker
Whether you enjoy your job or not, a universal problem is relating
civilly to obnoxious and/or in-competent co-workers. Usually, you
must maintain a tolerable relationship in order to get your own work done,
while nourishing your self-respect.
This is a special case because the needs you want to fill with a co-worker are
the same and
differ-ent than those with other people. Your response
options are the same as with other wounded people, but the risks of relating
ineffectively are unique (potential loss of job satisfaction and security).
A special challenge is deciding how to relate to a wounded supervisor,
manager, or team-leader. If their attitudes and behaviors are too obnoxious
too often, and if compassion, planting seeds, and con-fronting
constructively don't improve this, you may need to find other work. Avoiding
this decision can be self-neglectful.
If you do change workplaces, know that average unaware
GWCs often unconsciously choose
low-nurturance school, social, and work environments
similar to their
childhood families. Each time they (you) do, it's a new chance to hit
bottom and begin true healing.
For more perspective and options on
relating to wounded co-workers, see this.
We just hilighted relationship options with special wounded people - mates,
ex mates, minor kids, childhood caregivers, and co-workers. Pause, breathe,
and notice what you're feeling and thinking. If you've learned anything
useful here, what is it?
Recap
This article is one of a series on healthy-relationship fundamentals. It
proposes that a normal re-action to growing up with too little
nurturance automatically promotes a
and up to five related psychological
which cause significant personal and social problems. Most aver-age Americans
appear to be
(GWCs) in denial, which promotes major per-sonal, family, and social stress.
Once aware of these "false-self"
and what they
you can...
-
yourself for false-self
dominance and wounds, and intentionally
them;
-
change your attitude about wounded
people from disdain and pity to respect and compassion; and...
-
learn to spot wounded adults and kids, and
assert your needs and limits with them respectfully while keeping your integrity
intact.
This article offers perspective
on and guidelines for these responses, and briefly explores
relation-ship-response options
with wounded mates,
ex mates,
kids,
relatives, and
co-workers. For more detail, follow
the links.
+ + +
Pause, breathe, and recall
why you read this article. Did you get what
you needed? If so, what do you need now? If not - what
you need? Is there anyone you want to
discuss these ideas with?
Who's answering these
questions - your wise resident
or '
<<
Prior page /
Add to favorites
/
Print page
/
Email this article's address
>>