Lesson 5 of 8 - evolve and enjoy a high-nurturance family

About addiction recovery and
personality subselves  - p. 4 of 11

How to Intervene with
an Addicted Person

By Peter K. Gerlach, MSW
Member NSRC Experts Council

The Web address of this 11-page series is http://sfhelp.org/fam/addiction.htm

This continues a series of articles on addictions.

Confront Directly, by Yourself

        When you hit bottom (can no longer tolerate the effects of the addict's behaviors), your subselves can...

  • deny, minimize, or repress this;

  • self-medicate (distract) yourself; and/or...

  • confront the addict directly - alone or with help.

The first two strategies indicate your Self is disabled. Let's look at confronting by yourself...

Clarify your Goals (Needs)

        After preparing yourself and committing to the guidelines above, an essential next step is to clearly identify the primary needs you're trying to fill by confronting the self-medicating person. Two learnable skills that can help you do this are awareness and digging down. Gain useful perspective on discerning your needs by studying this article.

        Typically, you'll have several primary needs at once - e.g. "I need to...

  • ...preserve my integrity and self-respect by doing what I can to help the addict and his/her/our family now."

  • ...stop living in fear, and acting and feeling like a helpless victim."

  • ...feel authentic and strong, rather than feeling like an imposter, phony, and a coward."

  • ...do what I can to guard our child(ren) against the effects of growing up in an addicted (low-nurturance) family;"

  • ...cause some kind of resolution and end the perpetual stress I feel"

  • ...convert chronic, mounting hopelessness and despair into credible hope for a better future."

You may have other unique needs (discomforts) you wish to fill (reduce). Your mix of needs will determine how you...

Define "An Effective Confrontation"

        Premise - in this context, an effective confrontation fills (a) your and (b) other involved people's primary needs well enough, as judged by you and them..

        Your specific needs may include some or all of these: "I need (the addicted person) or enabler to...

  • understand what my concern is, and why I'm concerned'; and to...

  • want to learn about addiction and recovery fundamentals; and to...

  • want to (a) break their protective denials, and (b) accept the specific effects of her or his com-pulsive self-medication or enabling; and I need this person to...

  • understand (a) what actions (changes) I'm requesting or demanding, and (b) what I'll do if s/he chooses not to act; and (ideally), I need the person to...

  • want to problem-solve with me on reducing the toxic family effects of her or his addiction.

        These are ideal needs. You can sum them up as "I need to do everything I can to help  (the addict) hit true bottom now, and want to recover from their compulsive self-medication." A fundamental longer-range need is "I need to co-create a foundation for (the addict) to want to heal his or her false-self wounds and unawareness, and end the inherited [wounds + ignorance] cycle."

        Pause and reflect - do these needs seem realistic and relevant to you now? If not - who is control-ling your personality subselves now?

        The other person will need to feel (a) respected, (b) genuinely listened to by you., and (c) empathized with, vs. pitied, discounted, or scorned;.

        The more of your and the other person's needs feel filled "well enough," the more effective your con-frontation will be. Do you agree?

Prepare, and Confront

        Raise your odds for a mutually-effective confrontation by...

  • asking your Higher Power to guide and support you all, as you confront;

  • telling other affected people (a) what you're going to do and (b) why, beforehand; and respectfully consider what each of them needs in this situation; and...

  • putting your Self in charge, and maintaining a genuine attitude of mutual respect; and...

  • expecting the other person to "resist" your assertions, and being ready to use empathic listening and respectful reassertion and limit-setting as often as needed to get her or him to hear (vs. agree with) you; and prepare by...

  • reviewing (a) your and the other person's basic human rights; and (b) the things you can and can't control about this person and situation; and (c) referring to these wise guidelines as you go; and...

  • reviewing the specific outcomes you want from this confrontation. and...

  • picking a time and place when you and the other person are physically and emotionally undistracted.

        For perspective, imagine the odds for asserting your needs to the other person effectively without making preparations like these...

Status Check - on a scale of one (I'm not motivated to make any of these confrontation-preparations) to 10 (I'm strongly motivated to make each of these preparations), I'd rate myself as a ___ now. Is your true Self answering this, or "someone else"?

        The second of your three options is to...

Confront Directly, with Qualified Help

        The emotional impact of any confrontation rises significantly if you ask one or two other concerned adults or older children to join you in asserting your needs and any boundaries. If you choose this option, you need to carefully pick and prepare qualified helpers.

        If you have a mate who has a relationship with the addict and/or any enablers, you must first decide on his or her role: a co-confronter, an indirect supporter, or neutrally uninvolved. If your partner is the ad-dict in question, see this. If the addict is in a divorcing family or stepfamily, you may need to choose the confrontation-role of her or his ex mate, too. If an ex mate is the addict, see this.

        These role-choices deserve thoughtful, honest discussion, for they will cause reactions ranging be-tween gratitude and hostility in the addict and any enablers. Option - ask your partner and/or ex to read this and appropriate related articles, and then to honestly say if and how s/he wants to be involved. Then assert what you need. If you two (or three) have a significant conflict about this, put resolving it ahead of doing anything else. Start by reminding each other of your current long-term life priorities and goals...

        Ideally, each adult you ask to help you confront will...

  • be clearly guided by his or her true Self, and will ...

  • have studied and discussed this article, or equivalent; and will be willing to ...

  • discuss and follow these foundation preparations fully. Option - use this status check to gauge the helper's knowledge.

        And each qualified helper should...

  • be able to clearly describe their own reasons (primary needs) for confronting; and s/he should...

  • want to join you in preparing specifically for each confrontation you want to make, whether phased or direct.

        There are at least two downsides to this option. First, each additional person you involve raises the odds you'll have to resolve conflicts over if, who, how, and when to confront. Second, your target person is more apt to "resist" (feel embarrassed, guilty, anxious, resentful, hurt, angry, and defensive) if several people confront him or her. The local confrontation-preparations above can help you handle this calmly.

        Reflect on how you want to interview prospective helpers to decide if you want to ask their help. You have many choices. Four criteria to consider are...

  • who would have the most impact on the addicted person?;

  • who is most likely to agree to help you?

  • who is least likely to cause major polarization and uproar in the target person's family if s/he confronts with you?, and...

  • who best meets the criteria  above?

Status Check - on a scale of one (I want to confront by myself) to 10 (I want qualified help to confront), where do you rank yourself now ___? Is your Self doing this ranking? If not - who is?

        We're reviewing three options for direct confrontations of addicts and/or their enablers: confront by yourself, confront with one or two qualified helpers, or plan and make a group "intervention." This page outlines the last of these options, and recaps the whole article.

Plan and Make a Group Intervention

        Probably the most effective choice you can make toward helping an adult hit bottom and want to recover is to do a well-planned group intervention. To intervene means "to come between." In this con-text, an intervention is a planned group meeting to come between a self-medicating person and their de-nials and compulsive toxic behaviors - i.e. to respectfully force them to confront the effects of their be-havior.

        The two goals of an effective intervention are to...

motivate the addict to participate in a qualified in-patient recovery program, and to...

satisfy the deep need that people who care about the addict and her or his family to do their best to offer meaningful help - without feeling responsible.

If the first goal isn't met, the second one may be.

Typical Intervention Steps

        A typical intervention starts with a concerned person who decides there is enough of a problem to act on: e.g. you. You...

        locate and consult with a trained addictions counselor. Some people attempt interventions without professional help, which lowers the odds of successful outcomes. If the counselor agrees that an inter-vention is warranted after hearing your situation, s/he will outline a version of the steps below, and ask if you'll commit to them. If you commit, then...

        the counselor asks you to identify every relative, friend, co-worker, neighbor, professional (like clergy or doctor), and church-mate who (a) are concerned for the addict, and (b) have been significantly affected by the addict's (or enablers') behaviors. This list includes older kids, and people who live far away.

        Next, the counselor identifies or provides basic educational material about addictions, recovery, and the intervention process. A specially helpful resource is www.hazelden.com. Using those materials, you...

        contact each adult and child on the list in person or by phone, without telling the addict. You ex-plain the intervention goals and process, and ask if the person would be willing to help. If s/he agrees, ask the helper to review the educational materials, and thoughtfully write down several instances where the addict's actions inconvenienced, hurt, frustrated, or concerned the them. The general format of each instance is...

"(Name), I really care about you. On (date) at (place), you (did something recordable on video or audio tape) which affected me (in these specific ways), and I felt _____."

        An instance might sound like "Jeff, last August 15th, you told Marcy and me you and your partner would meet us at Granville's at 7 PM for dinner the following Saturday. We waited at the restaurant for 50 minutes, and the Maitre d' said we had a phone call. It was your partner, who apologized and saying you hadn't come home from work yet. Marcy and I were hurt, puzzled, frustrated, and concerned, and were out the price of an expensive baby sitter. You never offered us an explanation."

        The intent is not to shame, guilt-trip, attack, blame, or preach to the addict, but to inform her or him factually of the impacts of their behavior. Other goals are for each helper to affirm their deep concern for the addict; and to respectfully describe new boundaries if the target person chooses to make no change. The general format is...

"(Name), if you choose not to get help now, the next time you (do specific addictive beha-vior) I'm going to (take some specific non-punitive action)."

        The addict can complain that this is a 1-up threat, power play, or a controlling ultimatum. His or her defensive subselves may choose to see it that way, rather than seeing each helper's statement as a respectful assertions with clear consequences. Each helper's statement/s say Because I care for you and myself, I will no longer enable you. You have free choice on how to respond.”

        With the counselor's help, you research local addiction-recovery treatment facilities and pick one that provides the best mix of reputation, service, accessibility, and cost. Then you (a) negotiate a plan-ning date that helpers and the counselor can attend, and you (b) make reservations for the addict at the treatment facility without her or his knowledge.

        Next, all you helpers - including older kids - meet with the counselor. You introduce each other, and the counselor facilitates planning the intervention and answers any questions. You all...

  • reaffirm your common goals (to help the addict hit bottom, and protect your integrities),

  • review key realities about addiction and recovery;

  • rehearse and edit each helper's anecdotes for objectivity, clarity, and impact; and...

  • discuss effective ways of responding to the addict's likely reactions to hearing these anecdotes and new consequences.

The counselor educates and coaches everyone, offering questions, examples, suggestions, confronta-tions, and encouragement.

        When everyone feels ready enough, a you pick a date, time, and place for your intervention. Someone approaches the addict with a fictitious request on that date, and gets his or her agreement to come. S/He walks into a room where you all are gathered, and someone explains that you're all there to help.

        Introductions are made, and the target person is respectfully asked to listen without comment or explanation as each helper - including children - reads or says her or his list of incidents and new behav-ioral limits. The steady emphasis is on caring confrontation, not blame. After the last one is done...

        You assert clearly and directly: "We need you to go into treatment right now. I've made all the ar-rangements, your bag is packed and in the car, and the staff is expecting you.

        Your team expects and is ready to compassionately counter all the person's resistances. The addict clearly agrees to start inpatient treatment, or s/he doesn’t. "I'll think about it" or ”I’ll do it after (some future event)” are not acceptable responses. If s/he elects not to get inpatient help following your meeting, you all must manifest “tough love”: make good on the consequences you described.

+ + +

        This is a brief outline of a complex, powerful process. It has great potential benefits, and significant relationship risks. Not doing a well-planned group intervention has greater long-term personal and family risks. All involved people are invited to commit firmly to their own welfare and that of the addict and his or her family.

        A well-informed, well-planned intervention has the best long-term chance of helping a compulsive self-medicator hit true bottom, break protective denials, and learn healthier ways of reducing their inner pain. I know of no way to do a pain-free intervention. Perspective: pain and discomfort indicate that an adult or child needs to nurture (vs. neglect) themselves.

        A helpful resource is "Intervention - How to Help Someone Who Doesn't Want Help," by Vernon E. Johnson. There are other books and articles like it.

        Stay aware that hitting true bottom and admitting and successfully managing any of the four types of addiction, is the gateway to admitting and reducing the false-self wounds that underlie an addiction, and harmonizing the person's subselves under the wise guidance of their true Self and Higher Power over time.

        The best help you can offer an addicted (wounded) person and their family is to...

  • assess yourself for false-self wounds and codependence, and make reducing them your highest priority (Lesson 1 here); 

  • keep your Self in charge of your personality, and affirm your own dignity, rights, and needs;

  • use the strength and wisdom of your Higher Power to nourish and guide all of you;

  • learn and use the seven Lesson-2 communication skills in all your relationships;

  • respect the addict's rights, dignity, and needs as co-equal with your own;

  • stay clear and teach others that any addiction is a family problem, not just a personal one;

  • stay clear that addiction is an unconscious attempt to reduce unbearable inner pain - not a disease, shameful weakness, or "character flaw;"

  • choose not to enable the addict by (a) empathically confronting him or her and (b) respectfully enforcing clear boundaries as needed;

  • do what you can to protect affected kids (and everyone else) from the [wounds + ignorance] cycle;

  • get appropriate support (e.g. Al-Anon, Families Anonymous, or equivalent); and...

  • Follow these wise guidelines as you patiently do these things over time.

For perspective on relating to an addicted mate, ex-mate, or child, follow the links.

+ + +

Status Check #2 - to gauge what you've learned from this four-page article, re-take the first status check, and then do this one:

I can name and clearly describe three options for confronting an addicted person (T  F  ?)

I can describe at least four traits of a typical addiction enabler now  (T  F  ?)

I can describe what "phased confrontation" (planting seeds) is, and how to do it. (T  F  ?)

I can describe specifically how to prepare for personally confronting an addict or enabler now. (T  F  ?)

I can describe at least four traits of someone qualified to help me plan and confront an addict or enabler  (T  F  ?);

I can name the two main objectives of a group confrontation.  (T  F  ?)

I can describe the main steps in a group confrontation of an addict.  (T  F  ?)

I can say the Serenity Prayer out loud now, and I use it often.  (T  F  ?)

I can say out loud why I read this article, and whether I got what I needed or not.  (T  F  ?)

My true Self is answering these items now. If not - who is?  (T  F  ?)

Pause and reflect - what are your subselves feeling and thinking now?

Recap

        Addiction is a widespread, often misunderstood, highly emotional stressor in typical low-nurturance ("dysfunctional") families. These harmful compulsions seem very common in troubled adults, kids, and their families. Addiction is a problem by itself, and a symptom of underlying psychological and family problems. Each of the four kinds of addiction unconsciously aims to self-medicate – i.e. to relieve relent-less inner pain.

        The relief is temporary, and the pain inexorably increases over time. Unchecked, addictive attitudes and behaviors reduce the family's nurturance level, which wounds kids psychologically. Until they're ad-mitted and reduced, wounds and unawareness from low childhood nurturance (co-parental neglect) will silently spread down your generations.

        Based on 30 years' clinical training and experience, this four-page article proposes that all addic-tions are symptoms of a low-nurturance childhood and related false-self dominance and wounds: (a) ex-cessive shame, guilts, and fears, (b) reality and trust distortions, and sometimes (c) difficulty forming genuine bonds. The article also proposes if any adult in your and/or any partner's ancestries has signs of significant wound (including addictions) – you probably do too.

        This article summarizes addiction basics, including codependence and enabling. It outlines three options you have if you feel an important person may be or is addicted to a toxic substance, activity, mood state, or relationship:

  • avoid or postpone confrontation,

  • prepare for it, and...

  • do it, alone or with qualified help.

Your best-odds confrontation strategy is to organize an effective intervention with qualified help, as outlined above.

        If you feel you have an addiction (wounds), go here. If your family includes an addicted mate, ex mate, relative, or child, follow the links. For reliable information about addictions and preliminary recovery, I recommend the Hazelden Institute. Also see the Alcoholics Anonymous (or other 12-step) Web site. They all provide links to other helpful resources, including books, programs, articles, and online chat rooms and support groups. There is a lot of qualified help available now!

        Overall, if you and any partner feel any adult in your extended family was or is addicted, your living and future kids depend on you to act, vs. ignore it. Their psychological health and growth is in your hands. For helpful perspective and many resources, see the NACoA and CoA Web sites. Though they focus on children of chemically-dependent parents, their concepts apply to all minor kids in low-nurtur-ance families.

         For more perspective, read these research summaries:

+ + +

        Pause, breathe, and reflect - why did you read this article? Did you get what you needed? If not, what do you need? Who's answering these questions - your true Self, or someone else?

This article was very helpful  somewhat helpful  not helpful  

<<  series index  >>

<<  Prior page  /  Add to favorites  /  Print page  /  Email this article's address  >>

colorbar

 site intro  /  site overview  /  directory  /  site map  /  Q&A  /  quizzes   /  solutions  /  site search  /  glossary

  research  /  free course  /  guidebooks  NEW  forums  resources  /  feedback  and/or  subscribe   * copyright info

Updated February 14, 2010