The Web address
of this article is http://sfhelp.org/gwc/personality.htm
Clicking links below will open a full window or an informational popup, so
please turn off your brow-ser's popup
blocker or allow popups from this nonprofit Web site.
One evening an old
Cherokee told his grandson about a battle that goes on inside people. He
said, "My son, the battle is between two "wolves" inside us all. One is
Evil. It is anger, envy, jealousy, sor-row, regret, greed, arrogance,
self-pity, guilt, worry, resentment, inferior-ity, lies, false pride,
superior-ity, and ego. The other is Good. It is joy, peace, love, hope,
serenity, humility, kindness, benevolen-ce, empathy, humor, generosity,
truth, compassion and faith.
The grandson thought for a minute and then asked his grandfather: "Which
wolf wins?"
The old Cherokee simply replied, "The one you feed."
This is one of a series of articles on Lesson 1 in
this Web site - free your
true Self to guide you in calm and conflictual times, and
reduce significant false-self
wounds.
Do you
feel that all infants, adults and kids have a unique personality?
Think of someone important to you, and reflect on her or his personality. How
would you describe it? How would people who know you describe your
personality? How would you describe it?
Try saying out loud how you would define
"person" and "personality" to an average early teen.
Lesson 1 in this
non-profit stress-prevention site centers on assessing and
reducing
false-self wounds and harmonizing personalities,so clarity on
this word is key.
In these articles
and related guidebooks, "personality" means...
"The whole
ever-changing mosaic of an infant's, child's, or adult's
traits
that make that person unique from other persons."
"Traits" include the core values,
attitudes, priorities, preferences, talents, reflexes, beliefs, memories,
needs,
fears, hopes, spirit, Soul, and
self-perceptions (identity), that shape how a person (you) usually reacts to
your inner and outer environments.
this example of
subselves affecting the members of a real stepfamily.
Pause
and reflect: what are your subselves thinking and feeling
now? Now see how you (they) feel about each of these...
Key Premises
A normal human personality, character, psyche, or self
(small "s") is not a single monolithic aspect of
an adult or child. It is a
group (system) of interactive parts or
subselves which are probablydiscrete brain regions. These
regions are like an interconnected net of mini-computers, and have no
widely-accep-ted name yet. Historically, they've been called...
subselves
alter egos
small minds
sub-regions
subpersonalities
elements
daemons
(inner) voices
vices and virtues
selves
domains
agents
imagoes
higher selves
potentials
character flaws or
defects
moods
alters
energies
sub-identities
false selves
modes of Being
complexes
sides - e.g.
"musical"
traits
personality parts
identity states
internal objects
possible selves
aspects
self schemas
streaks - e.g.
"yellow"
(mind) states
See John Rowan's helpful book
"Subpersonalities
- the People Inside Us" (Routledge, 1989) for an inter-esting, well-researched historic
and clinical perspective on this. Master therapist Virginia Satir's brief book
"Your
Many Faces" provides a metaphoric way of viewing our many
subselves.
Your many
personality subselves evolve from
your unique mix of genetic +
spiritual
+ environmental factors. Some
subselves are genetically predetermined, and others come from your
cellular and sensory life
experience - specially between conception and your first four to six years of life.
Your "inner family" of talented
subselves evolves through a
series of interactive developmental stages over
time, influenced by
aging and life experiences.
Each of our personality parts
or subselves has
it's own unique talents, perceptions, goals, mo-tives, modes and styles
of communication, priorities, capabilities, limits, tolerances, rhythms,
devel-opmental cycles, "moods" and ranges of emotional sensitivity and
expression - just like physical per-sons. Your talented subselves...
areinteractive and
dynamic - i.e. they can communicate and ally with, ignore,
and oppose each other,
express and discuss themselves with other personalities (people), and
react unconsciously and consciously to others' opinions of them; And your
personality team...
is exquisitely
interactive with your bodily organs in ways we're (slowly) learning to
understand; and they...
seem to fall into
three or four functional categories:
(enraptured /
transcendent / enlightened / at One). And subselves ...
Are neither
good
nor bad. The effects of our
subselves'
behavior on our
wholistic health and other living things can be judged
as nurturing (promoting wholistic health, growth,
and full potential) to toxic or
harmful (inhibiting these
things).
Personalities and True
and False selves
One
universalManager subself, our
true Self (capital "S"), is naturally skilled
at harmonizing and leading all other subselves,
and making wise wide-angle, long-range decisionsif allowed to do so by other
subselves. The Self gains wisdom over time, as the host person
experiences and learns from life. Kids' true Selves haven't had a chance to
learn much, and therefore may be distrusted by other subselves as a
competent leader. Ideally, this is offset by the child being raised by adults
who are guided by their wise, mature true Selves. This seems to be
uncommon in our society so far.
When their true Self
leads their
other subselves, average people report some
mix of thesefeel-ings: alive, awake, alert, "light," calm, clear,
serene, energized, centered, grounded, purposeful, po-tent, strong, decisive, sure, aware, serene, compassionate, resilient,
realistic, focused, "up," confi-dent, and present.
They also automatically display common behaviors like
these.
Terminology
When one or more subselves distrust
and
disable our Self,
they are called (here) our
false self.When a false self rules, people display
common traits and behaviors. Here, self (small
"s") refers to all subselves together, as orchestra
describes the players, conductor, business staff, and Board of direc-tors together.
Following the work of Dr. Richard Schwartz, (Internal
Family Systems Therapy, Guilford Press, 1995)
your whole group of
active and inactive personality parts is called your
inner family in this site.
Thus
me, myself, I, and "mypersonality" all refer to a
group of interrelated
subselves.
From this view, personality is like the words team,
troupe, corps, gang, community, congregation, and family.
Sothe words "I" and "you" can refer to...
the person's (mind + body +
spirit and/or soul), or...
their whole
inner family (personality), or...
their current ruling false self, or...
their resident true Self.
These
semantic distinctions are vital in understanding and negotiating human
relationships and
recovery from false-self
wounds (Lesson 1). The goal of
wound-recovery is to
empower your true Self
to harmonize and coordinate your inner family of
subselves over time. My
guidebook
and these articles explore the ideas above in detail. Many
other books focus
on subselves too - this is an ancient idea.
From this view, "growing up" or
"maturing" is the multi-decade process of convincing your
gov-erning personality subselves
to trust and heed the wisdom and judgment of your wise Self and other
Managers, rather than depend on the subselves of other people or each
other as we did as children.
Typical survivors of
low-nurturance (dysfunctiona)
childhoods (i.e. most Americans) are unaware of...
(a) being ruled by a
false self
much of the time, and (b) what that
means;
and...
what life would feel like if their true
Self were consistently trusted and free to guide them.
How does what you just read compare with your concept of
"personality"? If you (i.e. your domi-nant personality parts) feel
cynical, skeptical,
and/or alarmed about subselves controlling normal people like
you, read this letter and
experience a safe, interesting dialog with a
subself you admire. Then see how you feel..
For perspective, about
80%
of site visitors responding to a
poll say "Yes, personality
subselves are real, without question.".
Personalities and Gender
Do you feel that typical male
and female personalities have significant differences?
Traditional wis-dom suggests that they do. People range
between indifferent to obsessive on judging their masculinity or
femininity. Does anyone you know come to mind as you read this?
Realities:
Typical male and female minds and bodies are similar in some
respects, and differ in others. These differences are not good or bad,
any more than a rose is better than a poodle. Many people are taught to
see males or females as "superior." This is usually based on...
unawareness of dominant false selves,
and...
personal, parental, and/or ancestral
(denied) feelings of inferiority (shame); and...
inherited and socially-amplified ethnic
stereotyping ("Blacks and Latinos are better lovers, and
Mediterranean men are more macho than Quakers or monks"); and/or...
unquestioned patriarchal biases from
inherited sacred texts like the Bible, Koran, or similar.
Some males are
genetically endowed with "female
brains" and vice versa. One implication is that some males
have "feminine personalities" - e.g. they are more sensitive, emotional,
reactive, relationship-oriented, social, and "softer" ("effeminate")
than typical males.
Conversely, some "masculine" females have "male brains
and personalities" - e.g. they're more focused on physical activity,
competition and winning, success, logic, things, power, and
achievements. See this interesting comparison of male and female
communication styles ("You
Just Don't Understand," by Deborah Tannen), and compare it with your
relationships and experience.
These normal gender differences may or may not include
same-gender sexual preferences. Evi-dence
is slowly increasing that against ancestral and religious bias,
homosexuality is partly (mostly?) based on inherited
genetic predispositions - i.e. normal.
Note that typical personality subselves may be male, female, or neither,
regardless of the gender of their host person Therefore, they may
have "masculine" or "feminine" traits of their own, and mild to strong
gender-biases about other subselves and/or physical people.
To make
things more interesting, subselves in a host person may have different
biases - e.g. one subself may see boys or men as inherently superior to
girls and women, and other subselves may strong-ly disagree.
So what does this view of human
personality mean - in general, and in your life?
Three Implications
First, the definition
above implies that personality traits are not aspects of a single entity
- they're signs of several interactive, semi-independent
subselves. Thus to say "Nate is really lazy" (a personality trait)
belittles the whole person, rather than saying "Nate has a specially
powerful subself who is scared to take risks and be assertive and
active. Nate has a wide range of other talented subselves too, which
seem to be suppressed and over-controlled by this dedicated Guardian
subself."
A corollary has to do with
personal identities ("Who am I?")
Thoughtful people can describe them-selves with many traits "I'm a fe/male
person who likes shrimp / has a bulldog / hates conflict / over-sleeps
too often / collects harmonicas / loves banjo music / is impulsive / has
big ears and freckles / ...")
People who do this are used to thinking
that key psychological traits are part of their personality which can't
change - specially their less thrilling qualities. A personal identity
includes current social roles, names and titles, relationships, history,
and other attributes beyond personality characteristics.
The multi-subself view of personalities says "Yes, your
unique
mix of subselves
give you certain psychological traits as an important part of
your identity - and each subself may shift its priorities, val-ues,
and behavior if your true Self needs to negotiate a change for
the common good.
Second, the widespread
human habit of stereotyping other people by their personality traits is
usu-ally wrong, and may harm persons and relationships. Recall the range of
personality "types" you've en-countered across your years.
Would you
agree that all of us tend to characterize each other by a few basic
(personality and be-havioral) traits - e.g. "Chris is impulsive,
sensitive, "fun," sexy, charming, cold, angry, depressed, driven,
childish, serious, analytic, bigoted, zealous,...: and so on? We tend to
simplistically characterize each other by (a) prominent traits and
behaviors, and (b) our (subselves') main stereotypes and biases.
Consider these examples of how dominant subselves promote simplistic
judgments and often-harmful biases:
"___
has an addictive personality."
What this really means is "___ is
often controlled by their protective Addict subself and related
Inner Kids."
"___
is oversexed and promiscuous."Reality: "___ is dominated by
shamed and guilty
Inner Kids, who are guarded by a
Sexual/Lusty subself who
ceaselessly tries to deflect their pain by creating sexual
excitement;"
"___
is a real cheapskate and miser."Reality: "___ is often ruled by
a
terrified Inner Child and a devoted Guardian subself who
tirelessly tries to reduce the terror by distrusting the resident
Self and acquiring and hoarding key assets."
"___
is a gossip and social butterfly."Reality: "___ is often unaware
of being controlled by a group of subselves (false self) who distrust
their true Self:
a well-intentioned
Pessimist
("We're doomed to being
alone forever!"), and...
a relentless
People Pleaser ("Let's
always be polite, unselfish, and thoughtful, so we won't
be scorned, rejected, and abandoned!")
And how about...
"___
is a rigid, angry, frustrated, bigot (or terrorist)."
Reality: ___ survived a very traumatic, low-nurturance childhood,
and is unaware of being usually controlled by a false self composed
of...
"___'s just a born loser."
Reality:
___ was severely deprived and traumatized as a child, and has been
chronically ruled by Shamed, Scared, and Lost Inner Kids; and their
dedicated
Fantasizer, Catastrophizer, Victim, Perfectionist,
Addict, and
Cynic Guardian parts who don't want to stress the Kids by allowing the
host person to trust the wise resident true Self and start living a
self-responsible adult life.
Try this yourself: review this article
and it's list of common subselves, Make an initial inventory of
subselves from each group you feel may make up your unique personality.
Then pick one or several traits you "don't like" in yourself or another
important person - e.g. procrastinating, being "messy," forgetting
names and dates, interrupting others, or bouncing checks.
Then instead
of labeling that as "a weakness and/or character (personality) flaw," try
explaining the ("negative" ?) trait/s in terms of a well-meaning false
self like the examples above.
A
Third important implication is for child nurturers. Often,
wounded, frustrated, and exasperated caregivers critically name-call (label) their
kids (as their own caregivers did), without thinking how the label will
shape the child's long-term self-image and identity.
This can sound
innocent, like "Nita, you just have a selfish / mean / cowardly / spacey
streak, don't you?" A sarcastic voice tone, avoiding eye
contact and/or eye-rolls, and/or a scornful/disapproving face send the
same toxic message.
Typical preteens are self-centered, and take
critical labels from key caregivers as literal cosmic truth that forever
defines who they are as a whole person. Alternatively, disrespectful
labels and inferen-ces activate kids' antagonistic, stubborn Rebel
subself - even if that increases relationship discord and
frustration ("I don't care if you ground me!").
Consider how different a child might react to...
being taught an
age-appropriate version of personality subselves (e.g. with simple
cartoon faces or figures), and then...
hearing a caregiver say something
like "Wow, your Messy Girl subself is really taking you over recently,
huh? Why don't we try to learn what she needs, and would help her want
to be
neater?"
Notice your
thoughts and feelings
now...
Recap
This article proposes that
normal personalities of kids and adults are composed of a group
of inter-related, semi-independent "subselves" or "parts," like the
talented members of a sports team or orches-tra. The composition and
behaviors of this group depends on (a) genetic and biological factors,
(b) how nurturing (very low to very high)
the child's home and other environments are, and (c) who usually leads
the group - a protective
false self,
or the talented resident
true Self.
The article comments briefly on gender-related personality stereotypes,
and examines three major implications of this ancient multi-subself
concept.
All
8 Lessons
in this nonprofit stress-prevention Web site are based on this
definition of personali-ty.Lesson 1
is the keystone among them. It is dedicated to...
describing a realistic framework for
identifying
psychological
wounds and
reducing
them over time; and to...
protect vulnerable descendents from
unintentionally acquiring such wounds by intentionally provi-ding a
high-nurturance environment.
Caregivers are most apt to
achieve this priceless goal if they are proactively reducing any
false-self dom-inance theyinherited
from their unaware ancestors and their early years. For more
perspective, see this.
+ + +
Pause and reflect - why did you read this article? If you got what you
needed, what do you want to do next? If you didn't, what do you
need now?
Who's answering these questions - your wise, resident
true Self,
or
'someone else'?