Project 1 of 12 - Free your true Self to guide your other subselves

happy.gif

Q&A about False-self Wounds
and Wound-Recovery
- p. 2 of 2

Overcome the Biggest Family Hazard

By Peter K. Gerlach, MSW

colorbar.gif

  • home > site overview > directory or site map > Solutions article, or other page > Q&A index, (wounds) > here

The Web address of this two-page article is http://sfhelp.org/qa/wounds-q.htm

        Links below lead to answers in a new browser window or a summery popup, so please turn off your browser's popup blocker or accept popups from this nonprofit site. Use the answers here to augment, not replace, other qualified counsel.  

Q15)  Is there a best way to reduce false-self wounds?

        Recovery from false-self wounds is as unique as your fingerprints and DNA. No one else has the composition, history, and dynamics of your inner family. No one else lives in the social and physical environment you do, or has your unique mix of dreams, fears, assets, experiences, limitations, and personality traits.

        So by definition, if you're burdened with significant false-self wounds, your recovery process must unique. However, you have the same goals as other wounded people: (a) freeing your Self to harmonize your inner family, over time; and (b) patiently reducing any related false-self wounds you suffer. You also have the same resources available to you. Review this overview of typical inner-family recovery.

top

Q18)  Do I need professional help to reduce my wounds? If so, how can I pick a qualified
helper? 

        If you judge your false-self wounds to have significant impacts on your health, relationships, and serenity, somewhere in your recovery process you'll probably benefit from some qualified professional help. Definitions of qualified vary as widely as current theories of "personality disorders" and "effective therapy."

        From 27 years' study and practice of psychotherapy with stepfamily, marital, and recovery clients (and original training as an engineer), I'm biased toward family-system-based schemes as being more effective than most other brands of "talk therapy." Effective means "promoting desired permanent (second-order) changes.

        In particular, I recommend a veteran (e.g. practicing more than five years) licensed therapist (social worker, psychologist, professional counselor (LPC), marriage and family counselor (LMFT), or pastoral counselor) who has training and experience in inner-family therapy or "parts work." The Internal Family Systems Association (IFSA) trains therapists in this model, and may offer a related certificate.

        Other therapies that may help in healing from early-life trauma and personality-harmonizing are EMDR ("Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing"), Psychodrama, "(Inner) Voice Dialog," and "Theophostic."

        The effectiveness of any of these clinical approaches is only as good as the health, experience, and creativity of the therapist/s. At the least, any therapist or counselor should be (a) aware of his or her own subselves, and (b) consistently guided by their resident true Self.

        Many experienced clinicians propose that effective healing requires some (a) personal work and (b) some experience in a group of recoverers, preferably led by a seasoned professional. I join many colleagues in believing effective wound-reduction therapy must include a strong theme of personal spirituality (vs. religion or mysticism).

        This is partly because of the demonstrated healing power of "turning over" insoluble or overwhelming personal problems to a trusted Higher Power and no longer compulsively trying to control the uncontrollable. There is growing documented evidence that heartfelt, humble individual and group  prayer really does seem to foster desired change, often in unexpected ways.

        If you're re/married, it's vital that any recovery professional you choose is grounded in (a) inner and (b) outer family-system treatment, (c) effective communication principles, (d) healthy-grief facilitation, and (e) stepfamily basics. For more perspective, see this, and this Q&A page on "counseling."

top
 

Q20 Why haven't I heard about inner wounds, subselves and wound-recovery before?

        There are at least two reasons. For perspective on the first, note that the popularization and acceptance of family therapy vs. psychoanalysis, has taken three generations (and is still happening). Clinical acceptance and understanding of multiple personalities and other "dissociative disorders" is less than two generations old. Public awareness lags that.

        The new concepts of modular brain functioning and the origins, dynamics, and effects of inner-family systems of subselves were unknown to your ancestors and childhood teachers. They're too new (and controversial) to have seeped into general public (your) awareness yet.

        The second reason these concepts are new to you and your peers is repugnant to most people. The unacknowledged [wounds + unawareness] cycle proposed in Project 1 here inexorably implies that American society and government condones (provides no legal sanctions discouraging) unwise child conceptions and ineffective (low nurturance) parenting - and they deny that, tho conclusive evidence is everywhere.

        We require vehicle operators, attorneys, police, plumbers, veterinarians, teachers, pilots, doctors, food purveyors, and CPAs to pass rigorous competency tests to practice - but we don't license couples to conceive and raise children yet.      

        Our governments and institutions use our tax money to analyze, report, and try to cure (vs. prevent) major symptoms of low-nurturance parenting, like crime, cancer, obesity, abortions, addictions, terrorism, homelessness, child abuse, welfare, suicide, murder, "mental illness," divorce, and "clinical depression."

        We do that rather than face the horror that we are a nation of wounded people unable to admit our widespread wounds, where they came from, and what they mean to living and future generations and our fragile global ecology. Our society has not hit a meaningful "bottom" yet, so our citizens and legislators continue to deny our denials and focus fruitlessly on curbing surface problems.

        Because this is so controversial and impactful, I know of no organization or media that has funded a concerted national effort to raise debate, research, and public awareness of the repugnant, vital need to license responsible parenting. As cartoon character Pogo said years ago, "We have met the enemy, and he is us."

        Until this changes, individual co-parents like you must courageously assess and heal your own wounds, forgive your unaware ancestors and younger selves, grieve your losses, and protect your kids and grandkids from false-self dominance by working patiently to raise the nurturance levels of your homes - despite major distractions, conflicts, and competing responsibilities.

        Are your family adults doing that for each other and your descendents yet?

top

<<  Previous page  /  Add to favorites  /  Print page  /  Email this article's address  >>

colorbar

 home  /  site overview  /  directory  /  site map  /  Q&A  /  quizzes  /  solutions  /  site search  /  glossary

  research  /  free course  /  guidebooks  NEW  forums resources  /  feedback  and/or  subscribe  * copyright info

Updated June 25, 2008