Lesson 2 of 8 - grow effective thinking and communication skills

Ways to Resolve Values Conflicts,
Impasses, and Cutoffs Effectively

p. 1 of 2

By Peter Gerlach, MSW
Member NSRC Experts Council

  • site intro > course outline, Lesson-2 study guide or links, forum, search, or other page > here

 The Web address of this two-page article is http://sfhelp.org/relate/vc_impasse.htm

        Clicking a link below will open a full new browser window or an informational popup, so please turn off your browser's popup blocker or accept popups from this non-profit site - no cookies or ads!

        This is one of 150+ Web articles exploring factors that promote relationship and family health and satisfactions. This brief introduction describes the site's purpose, author, and the best ways to use this information. Each article is part of a mosaic of related ideas, so the more you read, the more sense they'll all make. availalble Spring 2003

       This article is one of a series describing effective thinking, communicating, and problem-solving. The series summarizes seven learnable communication (relationship) skills  that are essential for building high-nurturance relationships and resolving social conflicts effectively.

        The unique guidebook Satisfactions (Xlibris.com, 2001) integrates the key Lesson-2 Web articles and resources in this nonprofit Web site, and provides many practical resources.       

        Before continuing, stop and reflect - why are you reading this - what do you need?

+ + +

        This two-page article focuses on one of three universal human-relationship stressors: values conflicts. The other two are loyalty conflicts and Persecutor-Victim-Rescuer relationship triangles. Typical family professionals and co-parents don't know how to avoid or identify and permanently resolve these problems - which means their kids probably aren't learning to do that either.


        This article...

        This article assumes you're familiar with...

Internal and Mutual Values Conflicts

"I like red meat. You like fish."

"You’re a "night person," and I feel most alive and alert as the sun rises."

"You’re a 'Right-to-Lifer,' and I support women’s choices on abortion."

"You're a conservative Democrat, and I'm a liberal Republican;"

"In child discipline, I believe in imposing parental punishments. You believe natural consequences usually work better."

"I think planning for the future is vital. You think living in the present moment is more important."

"Nancy won't let me play with her Nintendo. I let her play with my stuff!"

        These all are differences in personal beliefs, priorities or preferences - values - not right/wrong moral or situational absolutes like "child abuse is wrong - period." Our rich mosaic of human cultures, ethnic and family traditions, personalities, and life experiences guarantees that all people, households, families, and nations will frequently have minor to major values conflicts.

        Each child and adult (like you) evolves a unique way of coping with these stressors. Some ways are more effective than others, short and long term. When two conflicted people each refuse to compromise their values for a greater good, an impasse occurs. The underlying causes of major impasses can strain or wreck relationships and families, and cause aggression, legal suits, and wars. Stay tuned...

        A growing number of mental-health researchers and clinicians propose that normal (vs. pathological) kids and adults develop a group of semi-independent "subselves" that comprise their personality. Each subself has unique talents, limits, goals, priorities, and views of the world, like players in an orchestra or sports team. Depending on how well they're led, groups of subselves (personalities) can range from chaotic to harmonious - in general, and in confusing, conflictual, or dangerous situations.

        One implication of this is that average adults and kids can develop internal values conflicts between their subselves, causing confusion, uncertainty, ambivalence, and double or mixed messages. The most complex,  stressful situation occurs when two or more people have simultaneous internal and mutual values conflicts, and no one know that or how to resolve them effectively.

        Reality check - think of several key relationships in your life now. From time to time, do you each  experience significant differences in beliefs, preferences, and priorities? Can you describe how you personally and mutually react to these clashes? Now reflect: do you also experience internal values conflicts ("I want to stay in touch Mom, so I'll call her today." / "But that will lead to frustration and disappointment again, so don't call!")?

Premises - (a) The quality of any relationship over time depends partly on how effective partners are at admitting and resolving their internal and mutual values clashes; and (b) Minor kids depend on their adults to teach them how to resolve conflicts effectively. Do you agree? Did your caregivers do that for you?

            Is there a best way to react to values conflicts? I vote "yes":

      Common Responses to Values Conflicts

       When typical adults and kids encounter these unavoidable stressors, they (you) unconsciously choose responses we learned from early mentors, hero/ines, and experiences, like...

  • Explaining and lecturing - "Let me show you why your (value is) WRONG, and I am (my value is) RIGHT! (You must agree with me or you are bad or stupid, and I will scorn, reject, and/or punish you);" This is a common type of toxic black/white (two-alternative) thinking. Or we...

  • Avoid, minimize, deny, and/or withdraw - "Hey, no big deal (if we disagree), OK?" or (silently) "If you confront me with our conflict, I'll tune out, collapse, or leave;" Or average kids and adults...

  • Submit, (pretend to agree) deferring to the other person's value to avoid discomfort - i.e. discounting yourself and your integrity (losing self-respect); Or we seek to achieve...

  • Genuine acceptance and compromise - "No one is right or wrong here - we're just different on this point (e.g. a tomato is not "better" than an armadillo.) Let's (a) brainstorm and compromise or (b) if we can't find a middle ground, let's agree to disagree for the sake of our serenity and relationship, and move on"

       The first three of these strategies inevitably reduce self and mutual respect and mutual trust over time - i.e. they harm wholistic health and relationships. The first response implies a scornful "1-up" R(espect) message - i.e. "You feel you are a better person than I am." This usually evokes hurt, resentment, and fighting or fleeing - specially if a false self is in charge.

        The second and third responses leave the conflict unresolved, and weaken personal integrity and the relationship. If both people choose the fourth response, they're most apt to keep their self esteems and maintain or improve their relationship. Even if people agree with this premise, they may not be able to do it. We'll see why in a moment. 

        Stabilizing two post-divorce households, and merging three or more biofamilies into a new stepfamily, inevitably cause many significant values (and other) conflicts. These commonly include child discipline, visitation, custody, and financial support; religion, schooling, socializing, household and personal boundaries, assets, communication styles, holidays and celebration, and many more. Is that your experience? If so, is there a pattern to how your family members respond?

Why are Unresolved Values Conflicts a Problem?

         Because of (a) their mosaic of primary needs and (b) ignorance of the fourth resolution strategy above, most people endure unresolved values conflicts. Unresolved conflicts and relationship triangles among family members are symptoms of three underlying primary problems: co-parents' psychological wounds + ignorance of up to seven core topics + ineffective communication.

       In other words, values conflicts can cause surface frustrations, irritations, hurts, angers, and anxieties, but are often not the real problem. Note that the way people try to resolve their internal and mutual values conflicts (e.g. the first three responses above) often increases relationship and family stress.

        A second serious problem from unresolved family values conflicts is that dependent children emulate their caregivers and adopt one or more ineffective ways of reacting to them. In other words, if caregivers don't learn to...

  • reduce the three underlying problems above, and...

  • resolve internal conflicts first, then...

  • compromise or agree to disagree with each other and...

  • teach these things to their kids, then...

  • the young people enter adulthood vulnerable to major personal and relationship stresses at home and at work,...

  • causing their aging caregivers heartache and stress.

        So what should people (like you) do about these common disputes?

Resolution Options

        Option: print this and use it as a checklist until your co-parents and supporters can describe the steps from memory...

  • Accept the idea that normal people's personalities are composed of semi-independent subselves, which include a skilled leader called (in this Web site) your true Self (capital "S"). Then identify your unique team of talented subselves, and discern who leads them - in general, and in values conflicts. If a false self leads them, work to free your Self - i.e. work at Lesson-1 "recovery." 

  • Learn these communication basics, and then help your family members (and others) to use these seven skills (i.e. work at Lesson 2). Give special emphasis to the skills of awareness and digging down to discern your primary needs at the moment. Learn to distinguish between values ("I prefer broccoli to sushi") from needs ("I need you to admit that my value is 'right'.")

  • Adopt the attitude that when values conflicts happen, no one is "right" or "wrong." - just different.

  • Learn the concepts of...

    • internal and mutual values conflicts and...

    • win-win compromises, and then...

    • agree with other family members on clear definitions of each of them. Then...

    • expand your vocabularies to include these terms and definitions ("Hey - looks like we have another values conflict here. Let's brainstorm.")

  • Clarify and learn each other's personal priorities, and agree on your rights as dignified persons. Many values conflicts are opposing priorities.

  • When internal and mutual values conflicts happen together, help each other...

    • acknowledge that without blame ("I have an inner values conflict now.") and...

    • identify and compromise the internal conflicts first. That usually requires...

    • your subselves (personalities) to be guided by your true Self (capital "S").

  • When you can't find an acceptable compromise, agree to disagree for the good of your relationship and family harmony - unless doing so feels like a violation of your integrity and self respect.

        If your personal wholistic health and dignity is not your top non-emergency priority, you're probably dominated by a protective false self. When viable compromises don't appear, a useful tie-breaking question to discuss is...

"Which alternative is best for our relationship, long term?"

  • As you learn to use your version of these steps, help each other...

    • apply them to your loyalty conflicts;

    • adopt a long-range vision (e.g. the next 25-30 years); and...

    • patiently explain and model these ideas for your kids, relatives, and lay and professional supporters. The overarching goal is to protect future generations from inherited wounds and ignorance! 

        Pause, breathe, and reflect - what are you thinking and feeling now? If you have thoughts like "Whoa - this looks like a lot of work!" - you're right! So is living with escalating relationship stress from the three sources of unresolved values conflicts! (Can you name them?)

        If you feel that each of these conflict-resolution steps makes sense, honestly assess whether you're following them or not when significant values conflicts occur with the people you care about.

        If you're thinking "This is too complicated - we'll never be able to do all these steps," suspect that your protective Cynic/Pessimist, Worrier, and/or Catastrophizer subselves control your personality now. Seek to learn what your true Self feels about learning to practice a version of these conflict-resolution guidelines in your key internal and outer relationships.

        Experiment with these guidelines, and see what happens. You can tell if they "work" well enough if you and your conflict-partners feel...

  • heard and respected well enough;

  • good enough about the communication process between you, and...

  • you each can genuinely accept whatever compromise you've agreed on without significant resentment, hurt, anger, anxiety, and/or guilt.

        If the steps don't work well enough, objectively review your resolution process a step at a time - as teammates, not opponents. The two most common blocks to these steps working are (a) unseen false-self dominance in one or both partners, and (b) ignorance of - or not using - the seven communication skills, starting with awareness. A related problem is protective false selves denying or ignoring these two blocks, and justifying that.

Continue with options for resolving relationship "cutoffs." Do you need a stretch-break first?

<<  Prior page  /  Add to favorites  /  Print page  /  Email this article's address  >>

colorbar

 site intro  /  course overview  /  site search  /  definitions  /  forums contact  copyright info

Updated  March 07, 2010