|
|
|
- evolve a high-nurturance stepfamily |
|
Sample Structural Maps of
High and Low-nurturance
Stepfamilies
By Peter K.
Gerlach, MSW
Member,
NSRC Experts Council
|

Clicking links below will open a full window or an informational popup, so
please turn off your browser's popup
blocker or allow popups from this nonprofit, ad-free Web site.
Continued...
Map Symbol |
Stands for current nuclear-family member: |
SP1 ,
SP2 , SP3 , ... |
Living Step-Parent
"1," "2," "3," ... |
BP1
, BM1 , BF2, ... |
Living BioParent
"1," or BioMom "1," or BioFather
"2" |
DF1
, DM2 |
D = a
dual-role co-parent - e.g. stepFather and bioFather "1," or stepMom
and bioMom "2." |
C1 ,
C2 , ... |
Dependent
(minor) Children. The number refers to which co-parent/s are they related to - so BF2
and BM2 are the bioparents of each C2 child.
Biosiblings can live in the same bioparent home, or in different homes (split
custody). |
O1-2
O3-4, ... |
An
Ours child
born to a re/married family couple like SF1
and DM2. |
[BP], [BM]
or [BS];
|
A [dead]
or [absent] and still psychologically-important BioParent,
BioMom, or Bio-Sibling ... (e.g. an aborted, stillborn, or
grown child). |
[HP],
{God}, [Allah] |
The Higher Power/s
that significantly influence one or more household members, if any. |
R1 ,
BGM, ... |
Key Relative
"1", or a powerful BioGrandMother, or ... |
F1 ,
or Pr, or ... |
Important Friend
"1", or Professional person (priest, counselor, ...) |
(CP2 or
(C |
An excluded
or rejected Co-Parent "2" or Child. |
CP1 ||
CP2 |
Two Co-Parents
with blocked verbal communications. |
(CP2+C1
) or
(C2+C2) |
Psychologically
over-involved
or
Co-Parent "2" and Child "1", or
enmeshed Biosibs "2." |
" _ _ _ _ _"
and
"__________" |
Co-parental
responsibility lines. Put people above the line who have the most
consistent impact in directing current household residents feelings, actions,
and attention. Ideally, all resident co- parents would be always above the line, and minor
kids below.
Dashed responsibility lines signify generally open adult- child
communications. A solid line means communications are
blocked (people above
and below the line dont disclose honestly,
well, or
effectively). |
C ... C
 C... C |
Biokids visiting
between co-parents homes |
CP<<||<<CP,
CP>>||<<CP |
One-way
or mutually-hostile co-parent relationships, with blocked (ineffective)
communications. |
High-nurturance
Stepfamily Structures - Baseline Examples
There
are almost 100 normal multi-home
structures, from combinations of
child
custody, prior unions and child conceptions,
"ours" children, and prior deaths and divorces. Most of these structures fall
into three basic types: two, three, or four-home stepfamily
A few structures are one-home, where a widowed bioparent remarries a non-parent or another
widow/er.
The homes comprising all
four stepfamily types follow the same basic principals for a functional two-parent
biofamily (baseline 1 above). Recall that
most individual
co-parenting homes have two or more alternating structures: (a) minor kids at home,
and (b) some or all minor kids visiting their other co-parent/s. In a
given stepfamily home, one structure may have a higher
than the other.
4) Baseline 2:
High-nurturance new and mature two-home
stepfamily structures
When bioparents and
stepparents first live together, normally the stepparent does not have as much
co-parenting authority or responsibility as the bioparent: map _ below.
This is true whether there are minor stepkids resident or not.
The stepparent and
custodial bioparent are, ideally, co-equal partners in the non-parenting
areas of their lives. Both these co-parents are still consistently "above the
line" - i.e. no minor child nor any non-resident makes the major decisions in their
home. Communications in and between both related stepfamily homes are open
enough
here.
After
enough time,
the resident stepparent earns (vs. demands) equal co-parenting authority and
responsibility, as granted by the other members of both homes:
map _ below. These
two traits don't come with a marriage certificate! Co-parents who try to rush or
force stepparent authority usually produce personal, marital, and stepfamily stress and
conflict.
How much time does it take stepparents to earn co-equality? My experience is
that it can take anywhere from two or more+ years after
cohabiting,
depending on many variables. In significantly low-nurturance multi-home
stepfamilies, true co-equal co-parenting never evolves.
BP1
- - -
SP
- - - - -
C ... C
  |
BP2
- - - -
|
|
SP BP1
- - - - - - -
C ... C
  |
BP2
- - - - -
|
A) High
nurturance new- stepfamily two-home structure:
clear, open household boundaries, and clear communications. |
B)
High nurturance mature two- home co-parenting structure: open family
boundaries, and clear communications. |
5) Baseline
3 - A high nurturance, mature,
two-home,
two-structure
stepfamily, before and during
child visitation.
All communications are
open in and between both homes; Co-parents are in charge (above the line) in each
home. The divorced BioFather is not cohabiting or dating. The StepFather
has no biokids, and has earned equal co-parenting authority with BioMom. He
has earned the respect and co-operation of his three stepkids, over some years.
All members have adequately
their key losses from the bioparents divorce and
family splitting, and BioMoms remarriage. All three adults can (usually) talk openly
and respectfully, and can compromise well-enough together on co-parenting
decisions. There are no enmeshments, rejections,
or
living or dead controlling relatives. Each home has clear firmly-flexible boundaries.
SF BM
- - - - - -
C C C |
BF
- - - -
|
|
SF BM
- - - - - - -
|
BF
- - - - - -
C C C |
| Structure
1): kids home |
Structure
2): kids visiting |
6) Baseline 4 - A
high-nurturance three-home,
four co-parent, mature stepfamily
structure
with one "ours" child (O),
and child visitations ( ) between all three homes. The other structural states (during
visitations) of these three related homes aren't shown here. Neither ex mate (BF1
and BM2) is cohabiting, remarried, or dating seriously.
All communications are open within and between homes, all four co-parents are in (usually)
charge of their respective homes, and there are no resident, dependent, or controlling
relatives. All three homes have clear, effective boundaries.
All members have mourned their key divorce and remarriage losses enough, so they
dont need to exclude other stepfamily members. Note that BM1
is also a stepmom to C2, and BF2
has a stepdad role with C1. Well note
them as DM1 and DF2 to symbolize their complex
dual
co-parenting roles.
BF1
- - - -
C1 |
 
|
DM1
DF2
- - - - - - -
(C1) O C2 |
  |
BM2
- - - -
(C2) |
High nurturance three-home, four
co-parent, three-child nuclear-stepfamily structure
7) Baseline 5: A high-nurturance, mature, four-home,
seven-co-parent
stepfamily structure,
with three minor kids.
Both BF1 and BM2's
ex-mates have remarried, one to a previously single man (SF) and one to a divorced
biomother (DM3). Child visitations occur between all four homes, causing
several structural states. Not all are shown. Communications are open within and between
all four dwellings; no kids are above the line or co-parents below.
Adult/child
boundaries are stable and mutually accepted. C1 lives with BM1 and
SF. Child C2 lives with (dual-role) biomom DM2 and stepfather DF1,
and C3 usually lives with her custodial BioFather BF3. There are no
"ours" kids yet. No stepparent has adopted their stepchild. At times, all
co-parents have "kid-free" week-ends, because of visitation combinations.
There are no
interfering or seriously dependent relatives, live-in helpers, or boarders in this four-
home nuclear stepfamily. No one is seriously ill, debilitated, excluded, or withdrawn. There
are no major ongoing hostilities, coalitions, enmeshments, or alliances among any of these
10 related stepfamily members. If you're thinking this is unusual, you're right: this is
an ideal example.
Pre-visitation
household
structures |
SF
BM1
- - - - - -
C1 |
 |
DF1 DM2
- - - - - - -
C2 |
 |
DF2
DM3
- - - - - - -
|
 |
BF3
- - -
C3 |
A high-nurturance four-home, seven
co-parent, three-child nuclear-stepfamily structure.
Visitation
household
structures |
SF BM1
- - - - - -
|
 |
DF1
DM2
- - - - - - -
C1 |
 |
DF2 DM3
- - - - - - -
C2 C3 |
 |
BF3
- - -
|
The sample structural maps above give you an idea of how
the several types of multi-home stepfamily "look" before and during visitations.
They are our baselines, in that they are wholistically healthy: there are no major dysfunctional
structural elements present.
These are the structural household and family targets
most aware co-parents shoot for, over time.
Sadly, few real step-homes that Ive encountered match these targets. They look more
like some of these examples. How does your
multi-home stepfamily structure look?
<< Prior
page / Add to favorites
/ Print page
/ Email this article's address
>>
site intro / course outline / site search / definitions / chat / contact
Updated
September 29, 2015
|