|
|
|
- grow effective thinking and
communication skills |
 |
Metatalk Skill
Talk Together
Cooperatively
About How You're
Communicating
By Peter K.
Gerlach, MSW
member NSRC Experts Council
|

The Web address of this article is
http://sfhelp.org/cx/skills/metatalk.htm
Clicking a link below will open an informational popup or full
new browser window, so please
turn off your browser's popup blocker or accept popups from this
non-profit site - no cookies or ads!
This is one of a series of articles
in Lesson 2 - learn communication basics and seven powerful
to get more daily needs met more often. Progress with this Lesson
depends on simultaneous pro-gress on Lesson 1 - empower your
resident true Self to guide your personality in calm and conflictual
times.
The unique guidebook
(Xlibris.com, 2001) integrates the key Lesson-1 and Lesson-2 Web
articles and resources in this nonprofit Web site, and provides many
practical resources.
Metatalk
Communication Skill
"Meta-writing" is writing
about writing. "Meta-singing" is singing about singing.
"Metatalk"
is taking about communicating - i.e. cooperative discussion between partners about their shared communication process.
Use this skill to verbally describe your
communication
so you can
affirm what works, and improve what doesn't.
Rather than talking about "our
fight last night," metatalk focuses on "how we're talking now
about our fight last night." Mutually-respectful metatalk is an
skill
for identifying and resolving communication
Fluency with this skill can also help you discover and reduce significant false-self
(Lesson
1).
Growing your metatalk skill involves...
-
learning
some or all of the communication concepts and terms below, and...
-
using them strategically to
help identify, discuss, and fix internal and social communication blocks.
Metatalk
Concepts and Terms |
-
communication
-
Six core
communication
and need
-
(above or below the ears)
-
Face
and body (nonverbal) language or messages
-
(1-up, 1-down, or
"=/=")
-
and alternatives,
including moralizing, lecturing, blaming, hinting, ques-tioning,
preaching, monologing, defocusing, changing the subject, whining,
intellectuali-zing, explaining, withdrawing, numbing, pro-claiming,
threatening, demanding,...
-
Listening
reflections and introjections
-
Interruptions (vs.
introjections)
-
Trust levels
(low > high)
-
Communication
(chains of be-haviors and reactions)
-
Communication patterns
(repeated
sequen-ces over
time)
-
Meaning levels
(e.g. conscious and unconscious, overt or implied, and individual and group)
-
Voice
dynamics (tone, pitch, accent, rhythm, pace, inflection, volume,
affect, ...)
-
Flooding (a partner
giving too many ideas, words, and messages at once)
-
Concreteness and clarity vs. vagueness,
ambiguity, and generalizing
-
Inner and outer distractions
-
-
Communication
-
Communication
- e.g. placating, blaming, intellectual,
or unfocused...
-
Communication
focuses
- person/s, topics, timeframe, and inner and mutual
-
Communication-process
-
"Pressure of speech"
- excessively loud, fast, intense speaking and gesturing with high
and a solo awareness bubble.
-
Thinking / feeling balance in a person, com-munication
sequence, or relationship
-
Pleading (1-down attitude) vs.
requesting (mutual respect) vs. demanding
(1-up)
-
Persecutor
- Victim - Rescuer relationship
- internal and environmental
distractions
|
-
five concurrent communication
-
seven communication
-
Individual and shared
emotions and feelings
-
Communication
pacing (speed of thinking and speaking)
-
Positive or negative
framing of
communica-tion content
-
Three communication
channels
-
Mind-racing or churning
-
Eye-contact focus and patterns
-
Mind reading (assuming)
-
("thinking") -
dialogs,
sequences, and patterns
-
Decoding -
computing meanings from some-one's perceived behavior
-
Implied and
(signs of inner conflict)
-
Word and body-language associations and implications
-
Empathy levels (low > high)
-
- level 1 (surface) to level 2 (intermediate) to levels 3 or 4
(primary)
-
Surface and primary
-
Hearing
and
-
expectations -
(will I or we com-municate effectively here?)
-
vs.
concrete conflicts
-
Excessive
verbal repetitions
-
Flat (emotionless,
"low affect") speech; may go with intellectualizing
-
Meta-comments
- neutral observations
about your communication process
-
Mental images and senses
-
Using metaphors, parables, and stories
to convey complex meanings
-
Using logic (deductive
cause-effect thinking) vs. "organic" thinking
-
Black-white
thinking - reducing complex to-pics or situations to only two
alternatives, and missing key options
-
Emotional "tone" - e.g. serious /
"heavy" > playful / humorous / "light"
-
submission >
assertion > aggression
-
process
awareness (low > high)
|
Effective thinking and
communication are learned arts vs. a science because they're
shaped by emo-tions and unconscious impulses, thoughts, and associations
as well as logic. They are the main
skills we depend on to get our personal and social needs met
throughout our lives - yet most people never study them! Have
you?
Just as skilled
tradespeople develop their own terms, we communication artists
need to do the same (above). The paradox and social tragedy is that
most of us receive no training
in these communication-process factors, though we need to use them every day.
The good news: you can learn to use these factors any time!
| Reality check: could you teach someone
clearly (say a beloved child in your life...) what each of these
~50
concepts
means now? Could your family adults do that? Are your kids learning these well enough?
What if you or they don't? |
Motivator:
the high majority of my ~ 1,000 therapy clients and students have been unaware of
most of these communication terms, so they had consistent trouble resolving
personal and social
conflicts.
is often a major contributor to
relationship stress and ineffective childcare.
Learning these concepts and
using them
with
a mutual respect attitude can improve your
communication productivity and effectiveness if your
steadily
your
Notice your
now...
What Does Metatalk Sound Like?
Recall: metatalk is talking
cooperatively about your communication process. Each of us develops our own metatalk style and vocabulary, but
the theme remains constant: clear, objective descriptions of our communication
observations.
Imagine that you’re talking with someone who repeatedly
interrupts you. You notice this because you've learned to maintain a
two-person
in important discussions. You
note that you're feeling disrespected, hurt, unheard, and increasingly
irritated and frustrated. You then consciously decide to make a firm, respectful
meta-comment, like
"Chris, I notice that pretty often you start to
talk before I'm finished. I'm not feeling heard by you, and I'm starting to get irritated
and frustrated."
You could stop there, or you might add...
"Were you aware of doing that?"; or
"I'd
like you to let me finish saying my thoughts." The latter is an
assertion.
Another
scenario: your communication partner laughs, and says: "I just had the most
unbelievable fight with my sister. It was awful!" You feel confused, and say (a
metacomment):
"I just got a double message from you, Burt, and I'm
confused. Your words were: 'the fight was awful', but you chuckled
and smiled."
Notice how this
message would change if your voice tone was blameful [implied
"Im 1-up"] or apologetic (implied R-message:
"Im 1-down"). Teamed with focused process-awareness, metatalking skill is
vital, because its the input to identifying (then solving) interpersonal
communication problems.
Awareness + empathy + metatalk can help you give empowering feedback to a communication partner.
Reality Check
-
Can you clearly define now:
(a)
communication (how do you know if you're doing it?);
(b) awareness
skill, and (c) metatalk?
-
See how many of the
communication concepts above you can clearly describe to another person. The more of them
partners understand, the better able you'll be to spot and resolve
communication
and get more needs met.
-
Once you understand these concepts,
practice becoming
nonjudgmentally aware of them among (a) your
busy
and
(b) the adults and kids in your life.
Recap
This article is one of a series introducing
communication basics and seven powerful
that
any motivated person can use to get more needs
met more often. The article introduces the skill of metatalk
- talking clearly and cooperatively with a partner about your
process-awareness observations - i.e. about how you communicate.
This skill requires (a) your Self to
your personality, (b) a steady two-person
(c)
a genuine
attitude, and (d) learning to use a special descriptive
vocabulary of common communication elements and dynamics (above).
Use these requisites and the related six skills to identify significant
communication
and reduce them
together - as teammates, not opponents!
Next
- see these examples of metatalk in action
+ + +
Pause, breathe, and reflect -
why did you read this article? Did you
get what you needed? If not - what
you need? Who's answering this question - your
or

<<
Prior page /
Lesson-2 links
>>

site intro /
course overview
/
site search
/
definitions
/
chat /
contact
/
Updated
August 30, 2010
|